In Vitro Degradation of Electrospun Fiber Membranes of PCL/PVP Blends

Article Preview

Abstract:

The ultrafine fibers of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) composited with different Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone (PVP) content were successfully prepared by electrospinning method. The morphology, hydrophilicity and in vitro degradation behavior of samples were characterized by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), water contact angle and weight loss rate. Pore size and distribution on the fibers changed with the increase of PVP content. The hydrophilicity of PCL membrane was improved by addition of PVP. When the content of PVP was 25% and 50%, the water contact angle approached zero. The degradation was essentially a dissolution process of PVP on the first 7days. Since large specific surface, high porosity and different crystallinity, percent degradation loss of electrospun fiber membranes were about 1 to 12 times higher than that of cast films.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 332-334)

Pages:

1330-1334

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Langer and J.P. Vacanti: Science. Vol. 260 (1993), p.920.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Sittinger, J. Bujia, N. Rotter and W.W. Minuth: Biomaterials.Vol. 17 (1996), p.237.

Google Scholar

[3] V.L. Tsang and S.N. Bhatia: Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.,Vol. 103 (2007), p.189.

Google Scholar

[4] D.W. Hutmacher, T. Schantz, I. Zein and K.W. Ng: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Vol. 55 (2001), p.203.

Google Scholar

[5] L.G. Cima, J.P. Vacanti, C. Vacanti and D. Ingber: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. Vol. 113 (1991), p.143.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2891228

Google Scholar

[6] C.M. Vaz, S. van Tuijl, C.V.C. Bouten and F.P.T. Baaijens: Acta Biomater. Vol. 1 (2005), p.575.

Google Scholar

[7] C.H. Kim, M.S Khil, H.Y. Kim and H.U. Lee: Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. Vol. 78B (2006), p.283.

Google Scholar

[8] E.J. Chong, T.T. Phan, I.J. Lim and Y.Z. Zhang: Acta Biomaterials. Vol. 3 (2007), p.321.

Google Scholar

[9] T.W. Chung, K.Y. Cho, H.C. Lee and J.H. Yeo: Polymer. Vol. 45 (2004), p.1591.

Google Scholar

[10] Th Barrows: Clin. Mater. Vol. 1 (1986), p.233.

Google Scholar

[11] R. Arshady: Journal of Controlled Release. Vol. 17 (1991), p.1.

Google Scholar

[12] B.M. Baker, A.O. Gee, R.B. Metter and A.S. Nathan: Biomaterials. Vol. 29 (2008), p.2348.

Google Scholar

[13] J.P. Ranieri, R. Bellamkonda, J. Jacob and T.G. Vargo: Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A. Vol. 27 (1993), p.917.

Google Scholar

[14] Z.W. Ma, M. Kotaki, R. Inai and S. Ramakrishna: Tissue Eng. Vol. 11 (2005), p.101.

Google Scholar

[15] T.J. Sill and H.A. von Recum: Biomaterials. Vol. 29 (2008), p.1989.

Google Scholar

[16] K.S.W. Sing, D.H. Everett, R.A.W. Haul and L. Moscou: Pure and Applied Chemistry. Vol. 57 (1985), p.603.

Google Scholar

[17] E. Martines, K. Seunarine, H. Morgan and N. Gadegaard: Nano Letters. Vol. 5 (2005), p.2097.

Google Scholar

[18] K. Rezwan, Q.Z. Chen, J.J. Blaker and A.R. Boccaccini: Biomaterials. Vol. 27 (2006), p.3413.

Google Scholar