Co-Treatment of Rural Kitchen Waste and Domestic Sewage to Produce Biogas Research

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to deal with rural kitchen waste and domestic sewage properly, they were held in a reactor for co-treatment to produce biogas. The inflow was set as 50ml, 100ml and 150ml. The cycle was set as 3-day and 5-day. The effect of different inflow and cycle on the co-treatment was investigated during 45-day experimental period. The result showed that accumulative methane production had a positive correlation with inflow and cycle. Accumulative methane production of 150ml-inflow was better than that of 50ml-inflow. It multiplied 4.2 times during 3-day cycle and 1.2 times during 5-day cycle. Accumulative methane production of 5-day cycle was better than that of 3-day cycle at the same condition of inflow. It multiplied 4.8, 3.7 and 1.5 times, respectively. The quality of effluent was monitored as follows: CODCr > 10,000mg·L-1, TN ≈ 600mg·L-1, TP ≈ 100 mg·L-1. It could be serviced as the liquid fertilizer used in the agriculture fields. Rural kitchen waste and domestic sewage were disposed as fertilizer and used in situ.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

467-472

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K. Ye, Thoughts about municipal domestic waste treatment, Environmental Sanitation Engineering, vol. 15, no. 5, pp.19-20, October (2007).

Google Scholar

[2] H. Xu, X. Lu , X. Li, and Z. Jing, A survey on village sewage pollution in a zone of Tai Lake, Journal of Agro-environment Science, vol. 26, no. 10, pp.375-378, October (2007).

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Zhao, Principles of solid waste resources and technology, Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2002, pp.358-368.

Google Scholar

[4] T. Geng, Resource treatment policy of high watery organic refuse, Jiang Su Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp.24-25, June (2002).

Google Scholar

[5] S. Fu, S. Yu, X. Yan, and Y. Fu, Co-digestion of waste activated sludge and kitchen garbage, Environmental Science, vol. 27, no. 7, pp.1459-1463, July (2006).

Google Scholar

[6] R. Li, X. Li, and S. Chen, Effect of mixing ratio of dairy manure and kitchen waste on anaerobic digestion, China Biogas, vol. 25, no. 5, pp.19-22, (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] R. Gao, Q. Yan, and W. Ruan, Enhancement of biogas production from waste activated sludge by adding of kitchen wastes via anaerobic digestion, Chinese Journal of Bioprocess Engineering, vol. 6, no. 5, pp.31-35, September (2008).

Google Scholar

[8] I. Kim, D. Kim, and S. Hyun, Effect of particle size and sodium ion concentration on anaerobic thermophilic food waste digestion, Water Science and Technology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp.67-73, (2000).

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2000.0057

Google Scholar

[9] M. Bilgili, A. Demir, and B. Ozkaya, Influence of leachate recirculation on aerobic and anaerobic decomposition of solid wastes, Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 143. no. 1-2, pp.177-183, May (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.012

Google Scholar

[10] B. Shen, C. Liang, Y. Zhou, B. Guo, and C. Wu, Study on producing methane with domestic waste anaerobic fermentation, Environmental Sanitation Engineering, vol. 14, no. 3, pp.24-27, June (2006).

Google Scholar

[11] J. Dong, Y. Zhao, M. Hong, and W. Zhang, Influence of alkalinity on the stabilization of municipal solid waste in anaerobic simulated bioreactor , Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 163, no. 2-3, pp.717-722, April (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.07.066

Google Scholar