NonConvex Iteratively Reweighted Least Square Optimization in Compressive Sensing

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, we study a method for sparse signal recovery with the help of iteratively reweighted least square approach, which in many situations outperforms other reconstruction method mentioned in literature in a way that comparatively fewer measurements are needed for exact recovery. The algorithm given involves solving a sequence of weighted minimization for nonconvex problems where the weights for the next iteration are determined from the value of current solution. We present a number of experiments demonstrating the performance of the algorithm. The performance of the algorithm is studied via computer simulation for different number of measurements, and degree of sparsity. Also the simulation results show that improvement is achieved by incorporating regularization strategy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 341-342)

Pages:

629-633

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. L. Donoho, Compressed sensing, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 52(4), p.1289–1306, (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/tit.2006.871582

Google Scholar

[2] E. J. Candes and M. Wakin, An introduction to compressive sampling, IEEE Signal Process. Magazine, vol. 25(2), p.21– 30, (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/msp.2007.914731

Google Scholar

[3] E. J. Candes and J. Romberg, Sparsity and incoherence in compressive sampling, IEEE signal processing magazine, pp.969-985, 10th April (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] E. J. Candes and T. Tao, Reflection on compressive sensing, IEEE signal processing magazine, vol. 58, pp.14-18, December (2008).

Google Scholar

[5] E. J. Candes and T. Tao, Decoding by linear programming, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 51, no. 12, p.4203–4215, Dec. (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/tit.2005.858979

Google Scholar

[6] R. Baraniuk, Compressive sensing, IEEE Signal Processing magazine, p.118–124, July (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] E. J. Candes and T. Tao, Near optimal signal recovery from random projections: universal encoding strategies?, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 52(12), p.5406–5425, (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/tit.2006.885507

Google Scholar

[8] M. Fornasier and H. Rauhut, Compressed Sensing, April (2010).

Google Scholar

[9] R. Saab, R. Chartrand, and O. Yilmaz, Stable sparse approximations via nonconvex optimization, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2008.4518502

Google Scholar

[10] I. Daubechies, R. DeVore, M. Fornasier, and S. Gunturk, Iteratively Re-weighted Least Squares minimization: Proof of Faster than Linear Rate for Sparse Recovery, 42nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, CISS 2008, pp.26-29, March (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/ciss.2008.4558489

Google Scholar

[11] R. Chartrand, Exact reconstruction of sparse signals via nonconvex minimization, Signal Process. Lett., vol. 14(10), p.707–710, (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/lsp.2007.898300

Google Scholar

[12] E. J. Candes, M. B. Wakin, S. P. Boyd, "Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted L1 minimization, J Fourier Anal Appl., vol. 14, pp.877-905, (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x

Google Scholar

[13] R. Chartrand and W. Yin, Iteratively reweighted algorithms for compressive sensing, Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2008.4518498

Google Scholar