Effect Factors Analysis of Flow Noise Generation from Perforated Duct Muffler Element

Article Preview

Abstract:

Flow noise regeneration from perforated tube muffler element was measured on the self-developing test bench, relationship model on total sound power of flow regeneration noise and structure parameters and work condition was established. Its model parameters were solved making use of hyper static least square method. Using the model effect factors of flow noise generation were discussed. Result shows that the reducing of the perforated diameter and the perforated part length is favor of the reduction of flow noise, and perforated ratio and expansion chamber diameter have less effect on flow noise. After analyzing spectrum structure of flow regeneration noise, it is displayed that with the increase of flow velocity projected peak value frequency has the trend of moving to middle and high, its intensity also becomes stronger, and sound energy in some the frequency accounts for about 60% of the total energy, Strophe number is the range of from 0.2 to 0.35.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

204-209

Citation:

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Rolf Jebasinski, Sascha Leng, Marco Jess. Investigation on whistle noise in automotive exhaust system mufflers[R]. SAE Paper, No2005-02-361(2005).

DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-2361

Google Scholar

[2] A.J. Torregrosa, A. Broatch, H. Climent, I. Andre, A note on the Strouhal number dependence of the relative importance of internal and external flow noise sources in IC engine exhaust systems [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration 282 (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.05.017

Google Scholar

[3] Seong-Hyun Lee1, Jeong-Guon Ih. Effect of non-uniform perforation in the long concentric resonator on transmission loss and back pressure. Journal of Sound and Vibration , 311 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.09.005

Google Scholar

[4] Rolf Jebasinski, Sascha Leng, Marco Jess. Investigation on whistle noise in automotive exhaust system mufflers[C]. SAE, 2005-01-2361( 2005).

DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-2361

Google Scholar

[5] Deng Z-x, Zhao H-j, Zhao S-j, Li P-r. Producting mechanism of flow noise generation from perforated duct muffler element, Transactions CSICE, 5, 27 (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] Hans Boden, Mats Abom. Influence of errors on the two-microphone method for measuring acoustic properties in ducts. J. Acoust. Soc. Am, 29, 2(1986).

Google Scholar