Characteristics of Coarse Woody Debris in Different-Age Natural Larix gmelinii Forests in Daxing’anling Mountains

Article Preview

Abstract:

Coarse woody debris (CWD) is composed of dry wood, fallen wood and large branches, and it is an important element for structure and function in forest ecosystems. In this paper, we studied the characteristics of coarse woody debris (CWD) of natural Larix gmelinii forests with different ages in Daxing’anling Mountains. The results show that (1) the CWD volumes in near-mature, middle-age and young forests are 88.55 m3•hm-2, 52.07 m3•hm-2 and 3.96 m3•hm-2, respectively; and their biomasses are 52.96 t•hm-2, 36.22 t•hm-2 and 2.35t•hm-2, respectively. Which indicate that the CWD volumes and biomasses increase with forest ages addition; (2) The CWD volume and biomass follow normal distribution in middle and near-mature forest; (3) the CWD volume and biomass decrease with forest age increasing within decay classes I and II, whereas increase in decay classes III, IVand V; (4) the volume of middle-age and young forests present a near normal distribution with decay class increasing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 347-353)

Pages:

107-111

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C.W. Woodall, L.M. Nagel. U. S. A. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 247 (2007), pp.194-199.

Google Scholar

[2] W. Wang, C. Yu and Z Liu. Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 20, no. 4, pp.773-778 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] M. Delaney, S. Brown, A. E. Lugo, A.T. Lezama and N.B. Quintero. Biotropica, (1998).

Google Scholar

[4] J.E. Fox and Z.F. Xu. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 158 (2002), pp.223-235.

Google Scholar

[5] L.M. Romero, T.J. Smith and J.W. Fourqurean. Journal of Ecology, Vol. 93 (2005), pp.618-631.

Google Scholar

[6] P. Zhao, H. Long, C. Song, et al. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Encironment, Vol. 24 (2010), no. 3, pp.173-177 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Liu, Y. Chang, H. Chen, et al. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 19 (2007), no. 3, pp.487-493 ( in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] H. Gu, J. Jin. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 20 (2009), no. 2, pp.265-270.

Google Scholar

[9] G. Jin. Natural Journal, Vol. 24 (2009), no. 7, 1256-1265.

Google Scholar

[10] P. Wei, D. Wen, Z. Huang, et al. Acta Ecologica Sinica, Vol. 20 (1997), no. 17, pp.505-510 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] G. Oheimb, C. Westphal and W. Hardtle. European Journal Forest Research, Vol. 26 (2007), pp.359-370.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Liu, G. Jin. China Acta Ecologica Sinica, Vol. 29 (2009), no. 3, pp.1398-1437 ( in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[13] R. Motta, R. Berretti, E. Lingua, et al. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 235 (2006), pp.155-163.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Li, L. Yang. Forest Survey and Planning, Vol. 34 (2009), no. 3, pp.37-43 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] J. Gao, M. Wang, L. Bi, et al. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, Vol. 1 (2003), no. 2, pp.47-51 ( in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[16] M.A. Spetich, S.R. Shifley and G.R. Parker. Forest Science, Vol. 45 (1999), pp.302-313.

Google Scholar

[17] D.L. Rubino and B.C. McCarthy. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 183 (2003), pp.221-238.

Google Scholar