Growth Effect and Accumulation of as on / in Two Vegetables in Three Types of Chinese Soil

Article Preview

Abstract:

Greenhouse trials with brassica camprestris (BC) and raphanns sativns (RS) grown in three types of Chinese soils (Henan fluvo-aquic soil; Jilin black soil; and Hunan red soil) were conducted to evaluate the growth effect and accumulation of As on/in vegetables resulting from different arsenic contents in soils. The arsenic uptake rate of the vegetables response to type of soils and investigated plant species as well. Experimental results show that low arsenic content in soil has no effect on vegetable growth, but promote the biomass of vegetables. However, higher arsenic concentrations in soils lead to decrease in growth of both leaf- and root systems of the vegetables, especially when arsenic concentration is above 90 mg kg-1 in the soil. Arsenic levels in soils and vegetables correlated positively according to the experimental results. The tests also reveal that vegetables grown in alkali soils may accumulate more arsenic than that in acid soils, which suggests that arsenic in different types of soil may have different impacts on vegetables even with the same concentration. Arsenic concentration in RS is always higher than that in BC during the experiments, which indicates root vegetables may, have greater ability for arsenic uptake from soil than leafy vegetables potentially.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 347-353)

Pages:

2048-2053

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.C. Lucy, G. Mélida, T. A. Maria, L.V. Maria, Shuguang Deng: Chemosphere, Vol. 83 (2011), p.211

Google Scholar

[2] T. Gebel: Toxicology Vol. 144 (2000), p.155

Google Scholar

[3] Weike Zhong, Yaobo Fan, Minjian Wang: Agro-environmental protection, Vol. 20(2001), p.270 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[4] B. Katja, K. S. Manfred: Environmental Pollution, Vol. 157(2009), p.2617

Google Scholar

[5] M.G.M. Alam, E.T. Snow, A. Tanaka: Sci. Total Environ. Vol. 308(2003), p.83.

Google Scholar

[6] O. Munoz, O. P. Diaz, I. Leyton, N.Nunez, V. Devesa, M.A. Suner, D. Velez: J. Agr. Food Chem., Vol. 50 (2002), p.642

Google Scholar

[7] M.J. Abedin, J. Cotter-Howells and A.A. Meharg: Plant Soil, Vol. 240 (2002), p.311

DOI: 10.1023/a:1015792723288

Google Scholar

[8] Daolin Li, Fang He, Chengze Ma and Chao Tian: Agro-environmental Protection, Vol. 19 (2000), p.148

Google Scholar

[9] E. Miteva: Commun. Soil Sci. Plan., Vol.33 (2002), p. (1917)

Google Scholar

[10] P.Tlustos, W.Gossler, J. Szakova, D. Pavlikova, J. Balik: Plant, Soil and Environment, Vol. 50 (2004), p.540

Google Scholar

[11] M.J. Martínez-Sánchez, S. Martínez-López, M.L. García-Lorenzo, L.B. Martínez-Martínez, C. Pérez-Sirven: Geoderma, Vol. 160 (2011), p.535

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.11.001

Google Scholar

[12] V. Campos, M. Aparecida, F. Pires: Soil Sci. Plan., Vol. 35 (2004), p.2137

Google Scholar

[13] K. Davinderjit, P. Scott: Remediation, Vol. 12 (2001), p.77

Google Scholar

[14] R. Brett, D. Celine, B. Nanthi, M. Kannathasan and A. Saravanan: Sci. Total Environ., Vol. 301 (2003), p.67

Google Scholar

[15] A.O. Fayiga, L.Q. Ma, S. Jorge, B. Rathinasabapathi, B. Stamps and R.C. Littell: Int. J. Phytoremed., Vol. 7 (2005), p.231

Google Scholar