Exergy Analysis and Optimized Power Generation Applied to the Co-Combustion of Sewage Sludge and Coal

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, the classical sewage sludge and coal co-combustion power generating system was optimized. The regenerative steam in the extraction turbine was partly used for the sludge drying. And then, the mathematics model was established based on the exergy theory. Several extraction points were compared to find out the most optimization parameters (drying efficiency of the dryer, pressure and tempreture). The result showed that, with different steam temperature and pressure at different extraction points, the influence to the system exergy efficiency caused by the percentage of moisture and drying efficiency was different. When the sludge moisture content went to about 35%, the generating capacity increment was moderating. After the calculation and comparison, the error between the calculation results of the mathematical optimization model and the classical thermodynamic method was very small. The calculation in mathematical optimization model based on exergy analysis was relatively simple, and analysis of the relationship between variables was easier.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 354-355)

Pages:

67-73

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] R. Font, A. Fullana and J. Conesa: Journal of Analytical and Applied PyrolysisPyrolysis Vol. 74 (2005), pp.429-438.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Jingai, Y. Rong, C. Hanping, W. Baowen, H.L. Dong and D.T. Liang: Energ Fuel Vol. 22 (2007), pp.38-45.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Xiao, X. Ma and K. Liu: Energ Convers Manage Vol. 51 (2010), pp.1976-1980.

Google Scholar

[4] H. Xiao, X. Ma and Z. Lai: Appl Energ Vol. 86 (2009), pp.1741-1745.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Takahiro, S. Yoshizo, N. Hidekazu, Y. Takafumi, K. Takami and O. Seiichiro: Fuel Process Technol Vol. 90 (2009), pp.778-783.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Otero, L.F. Calvo, M.V. Gil, A.I. García and A. Morá: Bioresource Technol Vol. 99 (2008), pp.6311-6319.

Google Scholar

[7] P. Thipkhunthod, V. Meeyoo, P. Rangsunvigit, B. Kitiyanan, K. Siemanond and T. Rirksomboon: Chemosphere Vol. 64 (2006), pp.955-962.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.01.002

Google Scholar

[8] T. Ruiz and C. Wisniewski: Sep Purif Technol Vol. 61 (2008), pp.204-210.

Google Scholar

[9] W. Deng, J. Yan, X. Li, F. Wang, X. Zhu, S. Lu and K. Cen: J Hazard Mater Vol. 162 (2009), pp.186-192.

Google Scholar

[10] T. Ohm, J. Chae, J. Kim, H. Kim and S. Moon: J Hazard Mater Vol. 168 (2009), pp.445-450.

Google Scholar

[11] T. Murakami, Y. Suzuki, H. Nagasawa, T. Yamamoto, T. Koseki, H. Hirose and S. Okamoto: Fuel Process Technol Vol. 90 (2009), pp.778-783.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.03.003

Google Scholar

[12] H.L. Dong, Y. Rong, S. Jingai and T.L. David: Energ Fuel Vol. 22 (2008), pp.2-8.

Google Scholar

[13] W. Deng, J. Yan, X. Li, F. Wang, Y. Chi and S. Lu: Journal of Environmental Sciences Vol. 21 (2009), pp.1747-1752.

Google Scholar

[14] H. Liu, Y. Yan, W. Wang and Y. Yu: Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China Vol. 1 (2007), pp.67-72.

Google Scholar

[15] P. Zhang and Q. Zhou: Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China Vol. 1 (2007), pp.49-52.

Google Scholar

[16] A. Hepbasli and O. Akdemir: Energ Convers Manage Vol. 45 (2004), pp.737-753.

Google Scholar