The Performance Improvements of a Ground-Coupled Heat Pump System for both Building Heating and Cooling Modes

Article Preview

Abstract:

The objective of the paper is to describe the performance of ground-coupled heat pump (GCHP) system in 20 years. A mathematical model for simulation of GCHP system is built based on long time-step Eskilson’s theory. The design methodology is based on a simulation that predicts the temperature response of the ground heat exchanger (GHE) to monthly heating and cooling loads and monthly peak heating and cooling demands over a number of years. The temperature response also has a secondary impact on the predicted energy consumption of the system, as the coefficient of performance (COP) of the heat pump varies with entering fluid temperature. This paper presents GCHP system can achieve better energy performance in building that heating and cooling loads are balanced all the year round. It is illustrated by performing a GHE for a 300 m2 building located in Changchun, China.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 354-355)

Pages:

807-810

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Yang, P. Cui, Z. Fang. Vertical-borehole ground-coupled heat pumps: A review of models and systems. Applied Energy 2010;87:16–27.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.04.038

Google Scholar

[2] Spitler, J.D. 2000. GLHEPRO -- A Design Tool For Commercial Building Ground Loop Heat Exchangers. Proceedings of the Fourth International Heat Pumps in Cold Climates Conference, Aylmer, Québec. August 17-18, 2000.

Google Scholar

[3] Yavuzturk, C., J.D. Spitler. 1999. A Short Time Step Response Factor Model for Vertical Ground Loop Heat Exchangers. ASHRAE Transactions. 105(2): 475-485.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Michopoulos, N. Kyriakis. Predicting the fluid temperature at the exit of the vertical ground heat exchangers. Applied Energy 2009;86:2065–2070.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.02.002

Google Scholar