Operational Parameters and Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) Simulation Model of Integration Membrane Bioreactor (IMBR) Treating Sewage from Ship

Article Preview

Abstract:

Nowadays, in order to meet the new standard of IMO for sewage discharged from ship treatment, membrane bioreactor (MBR) was widely used in this field. In this study, a novel bioreactor named integration membrane bioreactor (IMBR) was used to treat sewage from ship. A lab scale experiment was conducted to find the best controlling strategy of operation. The results were as follows: The IMBR had strong adaptability and effluent stability under wide change in VLR which was from 1.2kg/m3.d to 4.3kg/m3.d; The HRT of the IMBR was suggested to be controlled around 6h; The IMBR operator was better in alkali-resistant and weaker in acid-proof, which implied the pH of suitable living environment for aerobic microbe should be higher than 6.5. At the same time, a simulation model of operational parameters was established based on theory of back propagation neural network (BPNN). The simulation model realizes prediction of which were the key impact factor and optimum operational parameters of the IMBR system. Each parameter influencing the performance of the reactor was compared using the method of partitioning connection weights (PCW). The weight of the influence factors was pH value> DO>influent COD in the experimental range.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 356-360)

Pages:

1042-1045

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yuanhui Yang. MBR water treatment on ships. electromechanical equipment,2002,(3):10-13.

Google Scholar

[2] Taoguang Bai. Technology and Development Tendency of Sewage Treatment on Ships. ShangHai Shipbuilding.2006,66(2):44-45.

Google Scholar

[3] Shidong Wu. Sewage Treatment Technology of the U.S. Navy in 21st Century. Ships and Equipment. 2000,4:32-34.

Google Scholar

[4] O. Cinar, H. Hasar and C. Kinaci, "Modeling of submerged membrane bioreactor treating cheese whey wastewater by artificial neural network", J. Biotechnol. vol.123, 2006, pp: 204-209.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.11.002

Google Scholar

[5] D.J. Choi and H. Park, "A Hybrid artificial neural network as a software sensor for optimal control of a wastewater treatment process", Water Res. vol.35,2001, pp: 3959-3967.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00134-8

Google Scholar

[6] Zhaobo Chen, Nanqi Ren, Aijie Wang, Zhen-Peng Zhang, Yue Shi. "A novel application of TPAD-MBR system to the pilot treatment of chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewater".Water Research, vol.42, Issue 13, July 2008, pp: 3385-3392

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.04.020

Google Scholar

[7] R. Lemoine, B. Fillion, A. Behkish, A. E. Smith, B. I. Morsi. "Prediction of the gas–liquid volumetric mass transfer coefficients in surface-aeration and gas-inducing reactors using neural networks"Chemical Engineering and Processing, vol.42, Issues 8-9, August-September 2003, pp: 621-643.

DOI: 10.1016/s0255-2701(02)00211-8

Google Scholar

[8] Aijie Wang, Chunshuang Liu, Hongjun Han, Nanqi Ren, Duu-Jong LEE. "Modeling denitrifying sulfide removal process using artificial neural networks"Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol.168, Issues 2-3, 15 September 2009, pp: 1274-1279.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.006

Google Scholar

[9] National Environmental Protection Bureau, Detection and Analysis method of Water and Sewage Editorial Committee. Detection and Analysis method of Water and Sewage. China Environmental Science Press.2004:83-94.

Google Scholar

[10] Huang Wen-rui, Foo Simon. Neural network modeling of salinity variation in Apalachicola River. Water Research. 2002. 36(1): 356-362.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(01)00195-6

Google Scholar

[11] Muriel Gevrey, Ioannis Dimopoulos, Sovan Lek. Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models. Ecological Modelling. 2003, 160: 249

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00257-0

Google Scholar