Cadmium Stress on Wheat Morphology: Germination and Growth

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this study, the morphological responses of wheat to Cd during the whole growth stage were investigated in pot experiment with substrates containing 0, 1, 5, 10, 50 and 100 mg Cd/kg soil. The results showed that wheat was moderately tolerant to Cd stress, and the most sensitive endpoint to Cd toxicity was tiller number. The seed germination was not effected by Cd at all concentrations. The No Observed Adverse Effect Concentration (NOAEC) was 10 mg Cd/kg, and the Low Observed Adverse Effect Concentration (LOAEC) was 50 mg Cd/kg for the wheat.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 356-360)

Pages:

1075-1078

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y.J. An: Environ. Pollut. 127 (2004), 21-26.

Google Scholar

[2] G.R. Shi and Q.S. Cai: Biotechnol. Adv. 27 (2009), 555-561.

Google Scholar

[3] J.P. Stolt, F.E.C. Sneller, T. Bryngelsson, T. Lundborg and H. Schat: Environ. Exp. Bot. 49 (2003), 21-28.

DOI: 10.1016/s0098-8472(02)00045-x

Google Scholar

[4] M. Ghosh and S.P. Singh: Environ. Pollut. 133 (2005), 365-371.

Google Scholar

[5] Y.L. Yang, X.L. Wei, J. Lu, J. You, W.R. Wang and R.X. Shi: Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 73 (2010), 1982-1987.

Google Scholar

[6] D.W. Ci, D. Jiang, B. Wollenweber, T.B. Dai, Q. Jing and W.X. Cao: Acta. Physiol. Plant. 32 (2010), 365-373.

Google Scholar

[7] R.Z. Lin, X.R. Wang, Y. Luo, W.C. Du, H.Y. Guo and D.Q. Yin: Chemosphere 69 (2007), 89-98.

Google Scholar

[8] N.A. Ali, M. Ater, I. Sunahara and R.P. Yves: Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 57 (2004), 363-374.

Google Scholar

[9] J. López-Luna, M.C. González-Chávez, F.J. Esparza-García and R. Rodríguez-Vázquez: J. Hazard. Mater. 163 (2009), 829-834.

Google Scholar

[10] A.X. da Rosa Corrê, R.R. Leonardo, M.A. Verdinelli, S. Cotelle, J.F. Férard and C. Marcos Radetski: Sci. Total Environ. 357 (2006), 120-127.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.05.002

Google Scholar

[11] M.-E Wang, Q.X. Zhou and L.P. Ren: Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 72 (2009), 2121-2129.

Google Scholar

[12] Q. Cao, Q.H. Hu, S. Khan, Z.J. Wang, A.J. Lin, X. Du and Y.G. Zhu: J. Hazard. Mater. 148 (2007), 377-382.

Google Scholar

[13] N.A. khan, I. Ahmad, S. Singh and R. Nazar: World J. Agr. Sci. 2 (2006), 223-226.

Google Scholar

[14] M.K. Jamali, T.G. Kazi, M.B. Araina, H.I. Afridi, N. Jalbani, G.A. Kandhro, A.Q. Shah and J.A. Baig: J. Hazard. Mater. 164 (2009), 1386-1391.

Google Scholar

[15] J. An, Q.X. Zhou, F.H. Sun and L. Zhang: J. Hazard. Mater. 169 (2009), 751-757.

Google Scholar

[16] C.H. Chen, Q.X. Zhou, Y.Y. Bao, Y.N. Li and P. Wang: J. Environ. Sci. 22 (2010), 1966-1973.

Google Scholar

[17] M.-E Wang and Q.X. Zhou: Environ. Pollut. 144 (2006), 572-580.

Google Scholar

[18] R.C. Sharma: Field Crop Res. 41 (1995), 55-60.

Google Scholar

[19] H. Nonogaki, G.W. Bassel and J.D. Bewley: Plant Sci. 179 (2010), 574-581.

Google Scholar

[20] Y.F. Ruan, Y.C. Hu and U. Schmidhalter: Environ. Exp. Bot. 64 (2008), 33-42.

Google Scholar