Effect of Surfactants on the Adsorption of Fluazinam in Soils

Article Preview

Abstract:

Soil contamination with pesticide has caused critical environmental and health defects and increasing attention has been paid for developing innovative technology for cleaning up this contamination. In this study, the effects of cationic surfactant cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide, anionic surfactant sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, and non-ionic Tween 80 on the adsorption of fluazinam at the concentration of 1/2 CMC, 1 × CMC and 2 × CMC in three soils were evaluated by using batch equilibrium experiment. The K values followed the order as: S1 > S2 > S3 in absence of surfactants. The use of a nonionic surfactant considerably weaken the fluazinam retention, while that of cationic surfactant has the reverse trend. The effects of anionic surfactant on the adsorption of fluazinam in soils is related to soil physicochemical properties and anionic surfactant concentration. These results are of practical interest in developing effective surfactant remediation technology for fluazinam contaminated soils.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 356-360)

Pages:

190-194

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y.K. Kim: Journal of Civil Engineering. Vol. 8 (2004), p.619–623

Google Scholar

[2] W.J. Zhou and L.Z. Zhu: Environmental Pollution. Vol. 147(2007), p.66–73

Google Scholar

[3] Mariana González, M Dolores Mingorance, Lourdes Sánchez and Aránzazu PeXX:Env Sci Pollut. Vol. 15 (1) (2008), p.8–14

Google Scholar

[4] P. Lecomte: The Polluted Sites: Treatment of Soil and Groundwate( Tec & Doc Press, Lavoisier, 1995)

Google Scholar

[5] W. Chu: Chemosphere. Vol.57 (2004), p.1139–1150

Google Scholar

[6] J. Fortin, W.A. Jury and M.A. Anderson: J. Contam. Hydrol. Vol. 24(1997), p.247–267

Google Scholar

[7] K. Hanna,, R. Denoyel, I. Beurroies and J.P. Dube`s: Colloid. Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspect. Vol. 254(2005), p.231–239

Google Scholar

[8] A.P. Piscureanua, T. Popb, M. Dogaruc, M.Piscureanub and D.M. Maximeanba: Colloid. Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspect. Vol.178(2001), p.129–133

Google Scholar

[9] M. Carmen and A.M. Dolores: Science of the Total Environment. Vol. 378 (2007), p.109–113

Google Scholar

[10] M.C. Chang, C.R. Huang and H.Y. Shu:Chemosphere. Vol. 41 (2000), p.1295–1300

Google Scholar

[11] D.A. Johnson and Z.K. Atallah: Plant Disease. Vol. 90( 2006), p.755–758

Google Scholar

[12] F.S. Dong, S. Yang, X.G. Liu, J.P. Sun, Y.Q. Zheng and J,R. Yao. Sci. Agr. Sin. Vol. 41 (2008), p.1684–1690

Google Scholar

[13] USEPA: Fed Regist. Vol. 40 (1975), p.26881

Google Scholar

[14] B.N. Aronstein, Y.M. Calvilla and M. Alexander: Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol. 25(1991), p.1728–1731

Google Scholar

[15] S.B Sun, W.P. Inskeep and S.A. Boyd: Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol.29 (1995), p.903–913

Google Scholar

[16] C. C. Wes and J. H, Harwell: Environ. Sci. Technol. Vol.26 (1992), p.2324–2330

Google Scholar