Analysis of a Weaver, Hartley and Saw-Filter Based, Image Reject Architectures for Radio Receiver Design

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents an analysis of the three popular image reject architectures used in radio receiver design. The SAW-filter based image reject architecture is the simplest to implement and has the lowest power consumption while the weaver is the most complex with the highest power consumption. The Hartley architecture which utilizes half the number of mixers used in the weaver architecture does not consume as much as the weaver architecture but is not as efficient due to the use of the 900 phase shifter. The three architectures are optimized for various design specifications. The receiver design with power constraints is better realized using the SAW filter while the receiver with portability as its highest priority is better realized using the weaver architecture. The architecture implemented for any particular radio design is determined by the receiver specification with the highest priority.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

199-204

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L.E. Larson, Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Technology for low power wireless Communication by IEEE personal communication (June 1998).

Google Scholar

[2] H. Lee, Monolithic image rejection Methods suitable for GSM receivers. A PhD qualifying examination report, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia institute of Tech (April 2001).

Google Scholar

[3] N. Yan. On chip image reject techniques for wireless receivers. University of Toronto department of electrical and computer Engineering. (Nov 2001).

Google Scholar

[4] R Hartley, Modulation System US patent 1666206 Apr (1928).

Google Scholar

[5] D. Pache et al, An improved 3V 2Ghz BiCMOS image reject Mixer IC , IEEE custom Integrated circuits conference, 1995, 95-98.

DOI: 10.1109/cicc.1995.518144

Google Scholar

[6] D.K. Weaver, A third method of generation and detection of single side band signals. Proceedings of IRE vol 44 No 12, 1956, 1703-1705.

DOI: 10.1109/jrproc.1956.275061

Google Scholar

[7] B. Razavi, Architecture and circuits for RF CMOS receivers. IEEE customs integrated circuits conference (1998).

Google Scholar

[8] Xin He, Fully integrated transceiver design in SOI process, PhD thesis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Kansas state University Kansas (2004).

Google Scholar

[9] T. Okanobu, D. Yamazaki and C. Nishi, A new radio receiver system for personal communication. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics vol 41, No 3, 1995, 795-803.

DOI: 10.1109/30.468082

Google Scholar

[10] M Banu et al, A BiCMOS double Low- IF receiver GSM . IEEE customs integrated circuits conference 1997, 521 – 524.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Wu and B. Razavi, A 900MHz/1. 8GHz CMOS receiver for dual band application IEEE journal of solid state circuits vol 33 no 12, 1998, 2178 -2185.

DOI: 10.1109/4.735702

Google Scholar

[12] On the direct conversion receiver. Application note 101735A. Skyworks solutions (July 20th 2001).

Google Scholar

[13] Tsung-Yuan Chang and Steven B. Bibyk, Analysis of the improved Hartley image reject receiver by bandpass delta sigma modulator. Analogue Integrated circuits and signal processing. Kluwer Academic publishers (1999).

DOI: 10.1109/mwscas.1998.759434

Google Scholar