Seismic Responses of High-Rise Buildings Subjected to Extreme Ground Motions of Tohoku Earthquake in Japan

Article Preview

Abstract:

Seismic performances of high-rise buildings are urgent to be studied given the background of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake and probable long-period ground motions happened in subduction zone near east-coast of Japan. One 20 story frame of CFT and steel high-rise buildings were modeling, and seismic responses of models were simulated in FEM program with fiber model subjected to extreme ground motions recorded in the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake and the relevant artificial ground motions. Analysis results indicate that, the frame models could not satisfy the seismic demand under extreme ground motions. The CFT model has superior ultimate stability behavior than steel model as result of confinement effect of confined concrete to steel tubular. The phenomenon of deformation concentration along with vertical direction becomes more intense when the inputting acceleration level arrives extremely higher.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 374-377)

Pages:

2118-2125

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Architectural Institute of Japan: Preliminary reconnaissance report on the 2011 Off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake, April, (2011)

Google Scholar

[2] Architectural Institute of Japan: Structural Response and Performance for Long Period Seismic Ground Motions, March, (2007)

Google Scholar

[3] Building Research Institute: Study on the Safety Countermeasures for Super-High-Rise Buildings etc. against the Long-Period Earthquake Ground Motions, December, (2010)

Google Scholar

[4] Yoshiyuki Yamamoto: Seismic Studies on the High-Rise Buildings Considering the Strength of Materials Degradation [D], Kyushu University, March, (2011)

Google Scholar

[5] A. Kawano and R.F. Warner: Nonlinear Analysis of the Time-Dependent Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Frames, Research Report No. R125, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the University of Adelaide, (1995)

Google Scholar

[6] M. Kim, Y. Araki, M. Yamakawa, H. Tagawa, K. Ikago: Influence of D-Delta Effect on Dynamic Response of High-rise Moment-Resisting Steel Building Subject to Extreme Earthquake Ground Motions, Journal of Structural and Constructional Engineering. No. 644, (2009), pp.1861-1868

DOI: 10.3130/aijs.74.1861

Google Scholar

[7] S. Popovics: A Numerical Approach to the Complete Stress–Strain Curves for Concrete. Cement Concrete Researches, Vol. 3, No. 5, (1973), pp.583-99

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-3

Google Scholar

[8] K. Sakino and Y.P. Sun: Stress–Strain Curve of Concrete Confined by Rectilinear Hoop, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, No. 461, (1994), p.95–104

Google Scholar

[9] Linghua Meng, Kenichi Ohi, Kohichi Yakanashi: A Simplified Model of Steel Structural Members with Strength Deterioration Used for Earthquake Response Analysis. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, No.437, (1992), pp.115-124

DOI: 10.3130/aijsx.437.0_115

Google Scholar

[10] K. Ben, H. Akiyama, H. Kuwamura: The Stress-strain Hysteresis Curve of Steel Based on Experiments, Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting AIJ, (1973), pp.937-938

Google Scholar

[11] K. Odawara, Y. Yamamoto, A. Kawano, S. Matsuo: Studies on Seismic Performance of High-rise Buildings Considering Strength Degradation of Structural Members (Part1. Inspection of Analytical Element Model), AIJ Annual Meeting Kyushu Chapter, Kagoshima, March, No. 50, (2011), pp.217-210

Google Scholar

[12] Japan Structural Consultants Association: Calculation and Management of Architectural Structure, JSCA waves (JSCA-10·300·L2-1), (2002)

Google Scholar

[13] Koji Uetani, Hiroshi Tagawa: Deformation Concentration Phenomena in the Process of Dynamic Collapse of Weak-Beam-Type Frames, Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering. No. 483, May, (1996), pp.51-60

DOI: 10.3130/aijs.61.51_2

Google Scholar