Numerical Simulation for Dynamic Response of EPS Geofoam Seismic Buffers

Abstract:

Numerical simulation for dynamic response of EPS geofoam seismic buffers placed behind the rigid retaining walls was carried out with the Fast Lagrangian Analysis for Continuum method (FLAC) .The considerations of setting boundary condition of the numerical model, inputting and correcting the dynamic time series of seismic acceleration, and selecting the proper damping were discussed. The coincidence relations of compression-time for EPS geofoam buffers and the horizontal soil pressure -time for retaining wall were numerically calculated by using the proposed model. The calculating results were compared with the physical testing results. The comparisons showed that there were good agreements between the numerical data and the measured data. The numerical results indicate that EPS panels placed between the rigid retaining wall and the backfill soil have a good effect on reducing horizontal earth force during shaking acceleration and can act as seismic buffers against earthquake. The FLAC model provides a feasible way to analyze the dynamic response of EPS geofoam seismic buffers for further researches.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 378-379)
• Pages: 256-261
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.378-379.256
• Online since: October 2011
• Authors: Yi Min Wang, Huan Li, Hui Zhang
• Keywords: EPS Geofoam Buffer, Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua (FLAC), Numerical Simulation, Retaining Wall, Seismic

References

[1] Hazarika H, Okuzono S and Matsuo Y. Proceedings of Thirteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference[C]. USA: Honolulu, HI, 2003, 1244~1249.

[2] Zarnani S and Bathurst R J. Experimental investigation of EPS geofoam seismic buffers using shaking table tests [J]. Geosynthetics International, 2006, 14( 3):165~177

DOI: 10.1680/gein.2007.14.3.165

[3] Bathurst R J, Zarnani S and Gaskin A. Shaking table testing of geofoam seismic buffers [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 27(4): 324~332.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.08.003

[4] Inglis D, Macleod G, Naesgaard E and Zergoun M. Basement wall with seismic earth pressures and novel expanded polystyrene foam buffer layer [A]. In Proceedings of the 10th annual symposium of the Vancouver geotechnical society[C]. Canada: Vancouver BC, 1996, 11.

[5] Bathurst R J, Keshavarz A, Zarnani S and Take A. A simple displacement model for response analysis of EPS geofoam seismic buffers [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 27(4): 344~353.

DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.07.004

[6] Wang Y. M., Bathurst R J. Horizontal slice method for force and displacement analysis of EPS geofoam seismic buffers for rigid retaining walls [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2008, 41(10): 73-80.

[7] Karpurapu R, Bathurst R J. Numerical investigation of controlled yielding of soil-retaining wall structures [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 1992, 11: 15~31.

DOI: 10.1016/0266-1144(92)90040-h

[8] Itasca Consulting Group Inc. FLAC (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua) User Manuals, Version 5.0[R].USA: Itasca Consulting Group Inc, 2005.

[9] Liu B., Han Y.H. Theory, Example, and Application Guideline of FLAC [M]. Beijing: The People's Communication Press, 2005, in Chinese.

[10] Specification of P.R.C., Code for seismic design of buildings（GB50011~2001）[S]. Beijing: China Architecture Industry Press, 2001, in Chinese.