Research the Layered Structure Affect on Seismic Dynamic Response of Rock Slope

Article Preview

Abstract:

The deformation and failure induced by Wenchuan earthquake between bedding and anti-dip slope existence very big difference. The number and size of the bedding slope deformation and failure are much more than the anti-dip slope according to the investigation and analysis. In order to analyze the layered structure affect on seismic dynamic response of rock Slope. As bedding and anti-dip slope is the study object and the seismic dynamic responses of different layered structure slope have been studied by using ANSYS finite element method in this study. Analysis shows that slope as a structure, the internal structure different lead to the slope seismic dynamic response is also different. The bedding and anti-dip slope seismic dynamic response is discontinuous or mutations in the slope as layered structure interface the boundary. And the seismic dynamic stress, displacement and acceleration of the bedding slope are always greater than the anti-dip slope. The seismic response characteristics further increased the deformation and failure probability of bedding slope. The results consistent with the investigation conclusion that the stability of anti-dip better than the anti-dip slope

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

439-443

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F.Y. A, J.M. Kong, S.J. Tian, Y. Cun, W.P. Wu: Geology and Exploration. Vol. 45(2009), pp.312-320.

Google Scholar

[2] F.Y. A,J.M. Kong Z.Q. NI,F. SUN: Journal of SiChuan University. Vol. 42 (2010) , p.56–62.

Google Scholar

[3] R.Q. Huang, W.L. Li: Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering. Vol. 27(2008) , pp.2585-2592.

Google Scholar

[4] M. Parise R.W. Jibson: Engineering Geology. Vol. 58(2000) , pp.251-270.

Google Scholar

[5] Luzi L, Pergalani F: Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. Vol. 20(2000) , pp.301-313.

Google Scholar

[6] S.D. LI, X.S. REN, S.Y. YUE, etal: Research of Soil and Water Conservation. Vol. 8(2001) , pp.24-25.

Google Scholar

[7] Y.Q. WANG,H.B. XING, Y.P. GAO, etal: Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. Vol. 23(2001), pp.311-314.

Google Scholar

[8] Y.L. HE, S.Y. LU, Ya.H. DUAN: Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute. Vol. 15(1998), pp.35-38.

Google Scholar

[9] Y.L. HE, S.Y. LU: Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. Vol. 20(1998), pp.66-68.

Google Scholar

[10] D. PENG, L.L. CHENG: Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute. Vol. 18(2001), pp.47-49.

Google Scholar

[11] L.J. TAO, S.R. SU, Z.Y. ZHANG: Journal of Engineering Geology. Vol. 9(2001), pp.32-38.

Google Scholar

[12] W.Y. XU, S.Y. XIE, Z.C. QI, etal: Journal of University of Hydraulic and Electric Engineering/Yichang. Vol. 20(1998), pp.11-15.

Google Scholar

[13] K.Q. XIAO, H.B. LI, etal: Rock and Soil Mechanics. Vol. 28(2007), pp.1557-1564.

Google Scholar

[14] D. MENG,X.C. MENG,Y. ZHAO: Coal Engineering. Vol. 1(2009), pp.77-79.

Google Scholar