Sustainability Index Benchmarking in a Semiconductor Manufacturing Environment

Article Preview

Abstract:

Sustainability is becoming an important tool towards our better future. More and more companies are looking into sustainability as their prime focus. Sustainability encompasses responsibilities towards social, energy, water, pollution and economic factors. Sustainability is the ability to sustain. Sustainability Index evaluation criteria and checklist has been created for a typical semiconductor manufacturing industries and the sustainability index has been compared with similar industry. Based on the benchmarking conducted for two plants one of them ranked at 75% indicating high on sustainability index. Benchmarking on sustainability index is a useful measure for shareholders, customers and employees.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 383-390)

Pages:

3377-3381

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] John Grant, The Green Marketing Manifesto, John Wiley & Sons (2007), p.43.

Google Scholar

[2] Guiding Principles of sustainable development - available at http: / sd. defra. gov. uk /what / principles [Accessed on 16 May 2011].

Google Scholar

[3] Townsend, Amy K., Green Business: A Five-Part Model for Creating an Environmentally Responsible Company. Atglen, PA: Schiffer Publishing, (2006), p.16.

Google Scholar

[4] Jerry Yudelson, Green Building Revolution, Island Press, (2007), p.17, 197.

Google Scholar

[5] Daniel C Esty and Andrew S Winston, Green to Gold, John Wiley & Sons, (2009), p.24.

Google Scholar

[6] http: /www2. dupont. com/Media_Center/en_US/daily_news/november/article20101129. html [Accessed on 16 May 2011].

Google Scholar

[7] Craig R. Carter and P. Liane Eatson, Sustainable supply chain management: evolution and future directions, Int. Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 41, No. 1 (2011), pp.46-62.

DOI: 10.1108/09600031111101420

Google Scholar