Effect of Electrode Coatings on Diffusible Hydrogen Content, Hardness and Microstructures of the Ferritic Heat Affected Zones in Bimetallic Welds

Abstract:

Bimetallic welds (BMWs) have been a necessity within the steam generators of nuclear power plants, where the heavy section low alloy steel components are usually connected to stainless steel primary piping systems. These welds represent zones with metallurgical discontinuities, which tend to localize the strains and cause failures. The other critical issues which must be taken care of while welding of bimetallic joints include solidification cracking, thermal fatigue and residual stresses in welds. The occurrence and severity of all these problems associated with bimetallic welds depend upon the type of welding process used along with the other variables like welding consumables, heat input etc. In shielded metal arc welding (SMAW), welding electrode consumables/coatings play an important role in deciding the weld metal quality. The development of welding electrode coatings is quite difficult due to very rapid complex reactions taking place during welding and the involvement of many controlled process variables. The present paper is an effort to highlight the general issues and challenges for the systematic and scientific development of welding electrode coatings for bimetallic welds. The experimental procedure contains three sets of coated electrodes having varying ferro-alloys, silica and carbon content. In the first set of electrodes, non-ferrous elements are also introduced into the weld metal through flux addition. Further, the welded joints are subjected to various tests and then evaluated to ascertain their mechanical as well as metallurgical behaviour.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 383-390)
• Pages: 4697-4701
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.383-390.4697
• Online since: November 2011
• Authors: Deepak Bhandari, Rahul Chhibber, Navneet Arora
• Keywords: Bimetallic Welds (BMWs), Heat Affected Zone (HAZ)

References

[1] N. Christensen and J. Chapman, Slag metal interaction in arc welding, Welding Research Council Bulletin Series, No. 15 (1953), pp.1-14.

[2] C.S. Chai, T.W. Eagar, Slag metal reactions in binary CaF2—metal oxide welding fluxes, Welding J., Volume 16, 7 (1982), p.229–232.

[3] P. Bala Srinivasan, V. Muthupandi, W. Dietzel and V. Sivan, An assessment of impact strength and corrosion behaviour of shielded metal arc welded dissimilar weldments between UNS 31803 and IS 2062 steels, Materials & Design, Volume 27, Issue 3 (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.10.019

[4] M. Sireeshaa, Shaju K. Albertb, V. Shankarb and S. Sundaresan, A comparative evaluation of welding consumables for dissimilar welds between 316LN austenitic stainless steel and Alloy 800, Journal of Nuclear Materials, Volume 279, Issue 1 (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(99)00275-5

[5] H. Naffakh, M. Shamaniana, F. Ashrafizadeh, Dissimilar welding of AISI 310 austenitic stainless steel to nickel-based alloy Inconel 657, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (2009), p.3628–3639.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.08.019

[6] S.L. Jeng, H.T. Lee , W.P. Rehbach , T.Y. Kuoc, T.E. Weirich, J.P. Mayerb, Effects of Nb on the microstructure and corrosive property in the Alloy 690–SUS 304L weldment, Materials Science and Engineering A 397 (2005), p.229–238.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.02.042

[7] R. Chhibber, N. Arora, S.R. Gupta, and B.K. Dutta, Use of bimetallic welds in nuclear reactors: associated problems and structural integrity assessment issues, J. Mechanical Engineering Science, Vol. 220 Part C (2006).

DOI: 10.1243/09544062jmes135