Cascaded Control Allocation in Overactuated Aircraft via Mixed Optimization

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the principle and application of a class of cascaded optimal control allocation approach for overactuated aircraft. The design is based on mixed optimized targets consisting of two parts: the tracking error of virtual control and the effectors’ error related to the preferred control vector. At each step, the unconstrained least square problem is solved through simple calculation to obtain the optimal solution. If any optimal commands exceed the position limit or rate limit, a scheme is designed to choose at most one effector set to its limit and the remaining virtual controls are redistributed among other unsaturated control effectors. The Simulation based on the ADMIRE model shows that the effectiveness of the proposed approach comparing with Cascaded Generalized Inverse and Fixed-Point Method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 383-390)

Pages:

5700-5706

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K.R. Scalera, W.C. Durham, A comparison of control allocation methods for the F-15 ACTIVE research aircraft utilizing real-time piloted simulations, AIAA-99-4281, pp.1653-1663.

DOI: 10.2514/6.1999-4281

Google Scholar

[2] K. Bordignon, J. Bessolo, Control allocation for the X-35B, 2002 Biennial International Powered Lift Conference and Exhibit, Nov. 2002, Williamsburg, Virginia, pp.1-10.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-6020

Google Scholar

[3] Jaehyun Jin. Modified pseudoinverse redistribution methods for redundant controls allocation, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 28, 2005, pp.1076-1079.

DOI: 10.2514/1.14992

Google Scholar

[4] J.J. Burken, Ping Lu Zhenglu Wu, and C. Bahm, Two reconfigurable flight-control design methods: robust servomechanism and control allocation, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 24, May 2001, pp.482-493.

DOI: 10.2514/2.4769

Google Scholar

[5] J. D. Bošković, Bo Ling, R. Prasanth, R.K. Mehra, Design of control allocation algorithms for over-actuated aircraft under constraints using LMIs, Proc. of the 41st IEEE conference on Decision and Control, Las Vegas, USA, 2002, pp.1711-1716.

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2002.1184767

Google Scholar

[6] H. Alwi, C. Edwards, Fault tolerant control using sliding modes with on-line control allocation, Automatica, vol. 44, 2008, pp.1859-1866.

DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2007.10.034

Google Scholar

[7] W.C. A Kishore, S. Sen, G. Ray, Disturbance rejection and control allocation of over-actuated systems, IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, 2006, pp.1054-1059.

DOI: 10.1109/icit.2006.372287

Google Scholar

[8] Ola Härkegård, S.T. Glad, Resolving actuator redundancy − optimal control vs control allocation, Automatica, 2005, pp.137-144.

DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2004.09.007

Google Scholar

[9] J.C. Virnig, D.S. Bodden, Multivariable control allocation and control law conditioning when control effectors limit, In AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, Scottsdale, Aug. 1994, pp.572-582.

DOI: 10.2514/6.1994-3609

Google Scholar

[10] K.A. Bordignon, Constrained control allocation for systems with redundant control effectors, PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1996, pp.82-101.

Google Scholar

[11] M. Bodson, Evaluation of optimization methods for control allocation, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, vol. 25, July 2002, pp.703-711.

DOI: 10.2514/2.4937

Google Scholar

[12] L. Forssell, U. Nilsson, ADMIRE the aero-data model in a research environment version 4. 0, model description, Technical Report FOI-R-1624-SE, Swedish Defence Agency, 2005, pp.25-34.

Google Scholar