Operational Framework for Manufacturing Resource Planning (MRPII) System Case Studies in Malaysian Small and Medium Enterprises a Taxonomy Model for Structural Misfit of MRPII System

Article Preview

Abstract:

Manufacturing resource planning (MRPII) system which is the core information system that supports the operations of manufacturing organization, are often failed to meet estimated benefits, impeding operational performance and strategic advantages, due to the misfit between the structure modeled in the system and the actual structure of manufacturing environment it intended to represent. Furthermore, disputations upon whether organizational adaptation is always superseding other misfit resolving strategies have increasingly exposed. Hence, this paper presents an operational framework – taxonomy model of MRPII misfit to be applied in a case study which involves three small and medium manufacturing organizations in Malaysia, with the purpose of systematically classify MRPII misfits, and subsequently to identify appropriate misfit resolving strategy (system modification or organization adaptation) based on the specificity of the misfit. The implications of each type of MRPII misfit have been discussed from the perspectives of degree of misfit severity, risk of the MRPII system, organizational discretion on structural change, and most importantly the misfit resolving strategy. In addition, the planned methodology of the case study is presented, in details of selection of case companies and data analysis method. The findings of this proposed study is expected to serve as general guidelines or basics that can be referred by adopting organization to build their resolving strategy, according to the specificity of MRPII misfit situation which they encountered.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 383-390)

Pages:

6792-6799

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. F. Gattiker and D. L. Goodhue, Software-driven changes to business processes: an empirical study of impacts of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems at the local level, International Journal of Production Research, vol. 40, pp.4799-4814, (2002).

DOI: 10.1080/0020754021000033913

Google Scholar

[2] C. Rolland and N. Prakash, Matching ERP system functionality to customer requirements, in Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, 2001, p.66–75.

DOI: 10.1109/isre.2001.948545

Google Scholar

[3] G. Juntao and Z. Li, Detecting Gaps between ERP Software and Organizational Needs: A Semantic Similarity Based Approach, IEEE International Workshop on Semantic Computing and Systems, pp.21-26, (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/wscs.2008.35

Google Scholar

[4] E. M. Shehab, M. W. Sharp, L. Supramaniam, and T. A. Spedding, Enterprise resource planning: An integrative review, Business Process Management Journal, vol. 10, pp.359-386, (2004).

DOI: 10.1108/14637150410548056

Google Scholar

[5] S. K. Sia and C. Soh, An assessment of package-organisation misalignment: institutional and ontological structures, European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 16, pp.568-583, (2007).

DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000700

Google Scholar

[6] L. Brehm, a. Heinzl, and M. L. Markus, Tailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implications, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 49, p.9, (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2001.927130

Google Scholar

[7] H. Liang and Y. Xue, Coping with ERP-related contextual issues in SMEs: a vendor's perspective, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 13, p.399–415, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2004.11.006

Google Scholar

[8] J. Swan, S. Newell, and M. Robertson, The illusion of 'best practice' in information systems for operations management, European Journal of Information System, vol. 8, pp.284-293, (1999).

DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000336

Google Scholar

[9] A. a. Hawari and R. Heeks, Explaining ERP failure in a developing country: a Jordanian case study, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, vol. 23, pp.135-160, (2010).

DOI: 10.1108/17410391011019741

Google Scholar

[10] B. L. MacCarthy and F. C. F. Fernandes, A multi-dimensional classification of production systems for the design and selection of production planning and control systems, Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations, vol. 11, pp.481-496, (2000).

DOI: 10.1080/09537280050051988

Google Scholar

[11] M. Mignerat and S. Rivard, Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research, J Inf technol, vol. 24, pp.369-391, (2009).

DOI: 10.1057/jit.2009.13

Google Scholar

[12] C. Soh and S. K. Sia, An institutional perspective on sources of ERP package-organisation misalignments, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 13, pp.375-397, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2004.11.001

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Wand and R. Weber, On the deep structure of information systems, Information Systems Journal, vol. 5, pp.203-223, (1995).

Google Scholar