Quantitative Process Risk Analysis Based on Dynamic Simulation of Gas Gathering Process

Jian Min Fu; Dong Feng Zhao; Chao Zhang; Yi Liu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.399-401.2226

Paper Titles

The Lattice Stability of Ti, Zr and Hf in an Ultra-Soft Pseudopotential Method of the First-Principles
p.2203

Experimental Investigation of the Phase Equilibria of Al-Zn-Ti System in Al-Rich Corner at 400 °C
p.2210

The Electronic Properties of Al-, P-Doped and Al, P Co-Doped Boron Nitride Nanotubes
p.2215

Study on the Range of Freeze-Thaw of Surrounding Rock from a Cold-Region Tunnel and the Effects of Insulation Material
p.2222

Quantitative Process Risk Analysis Based on Dynamic Simulation of Gas Gathering Process
p.2226

Quantitative Analysis of the Content of Substituent Group in Difunctional Polysiloxane
p.2231

Fatigue Behavior of Cast Steel ZG20SiMn under Stain Control Mode
p.2236

Thermodynamic Study on CuInO₂ Preparation by Solid Reaction Method
p.2241

The Studies on the Thermophysical Properties of Binary Systems of Neopentylglycol and the Derives
p.2245

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 399-401Quantitative Process Risk Analysis Based on...

Quantitative Process Risk Analysis Based on Dynamic Simulation of Gas Gathering Process

Abstract:

After nearly fifty years of development, HAZOP (Hazard and Operability study /analysis) has become the most widely used process hazard identifications method, basically covering all areas of petrochemical industry. As technology advancing and people continuing to increase safety requirements, HAZOP quantitative analysis has become a major trend. This paper gives an integration of traditional HAZOP procedure with Dynamic Simulation to quantify the HAZOP deviations and improve the operability of action required. A natural gas gathering process is selected to the application example. Uses the advanced process simulation software ASPEN HYSYS to set the modeling of the gas gathering process, and carry out the dynamic modeling in the light of main problems, and combing the dynamic simulation analysis gets the quantitative analysis results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

New Materials, Applications and Processes

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 399-401)

Pages:

2226-2230

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.399-401.2226

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2011

Authors:

Jian Min Fu, Dong Feng Zhao, Chao Zhang, Yi Liu

Keywords:

Dynamic Simulation, HAZOP, HYSYS, Process Hazard

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Guidelines for Hazard Evaluation Procedures, 2d Ed. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers (1992).

Google Scholar

[2] Trevor A Kletz. HAZOP-past and future. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 55 (1997), P. 263-266.

DOI: 10.1016/s0951-8320(96)00100-7

Google Scholar

[3] Vaidhyanathan & Venkat Venkatasubramanian. A semi-quantitative reasoning methodology for filtering and ranking HAZOP results in HAZOPExpert. Reliability Engineering and System Safety. Vol. 53 (1996), P. 185-203.

DOI: 10.1016/0951-8320(96)00061-0

Google Scholar

[4] Juraj Labovsky, Zuzana Svandova, Jozef Markos, L'udovit Jelemensky. Model-based HAZOP study of a real MTBE plant. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 20 (2007), P. 230–237.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2007.03.015

Google Scholar

[5] Shimada, Y., Suzuki, K., & Sayama, H. Computer-aided operability study. Computers and Chemical Engineering, Vol. 20 (1996), P. 905–912.

DOI: 10.1016/0098-1354(95)00187-5

Google Scholar

[6] Shimon Eizenberga M S. Combining HAZOP with dynamic simulation-applications for safety education. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. Vol. 19 (2006), P. 754-761.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2006.07.002

Google Scholar

[7] Mordechai Shacham, Michael B. Cutlip, Neima Brauner. What is "in" and what is "out" in engineering problem solving. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, Vol. 25 (2008), P. 1187-1192.

DOI: 10.1016/s1570-7946(08)80204-0

Google Scholar

[8] G. Chiappetta, G. Clarizia, E. Drioli. Analysis of safety aspects in a membrane reactor. Desalination, Vol. 193 (2006), P. 267-279.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2005.06.064

Google Scholar

[9] Jorge Contreras, Jose Maria Ferrer. Dynamic simulation: a Case Study. Hydrocarbon Engineering. (2005).

Google Scholar

[10] Lou H C. Large-Scale dynamic simulation for security assessment of an ethylene oxide manufacturing process. Computers & Chemical Engineering. Vol. 30 (2006), P. 1102-1118.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.02.011

Google Scholar