Web 2.0-Based E-Learning: A Probe into the Application of Online Social Networking in College Freshman English Curriculum

Abstract:

Interaction, sharing, and connection are at the heart of Web 2.0, giving rise to innovative online media usage and the concept social networking that have transformed not only the network behavior of the masses, but also the form of online learning. In college English learning courses, Web 2.0 provides real-time and easily-accessible online resources for students to search for the information they need, granting them more autonomy in the English learning process. Meanwhile, Web 2.0-based network tools and video-sharing platform, such as Wikipedia and podcasts, provide a user-oriented and user-centered mechanism that allows personal creation, cooperative creation, interactive social networking, and peer-to-peer mutual learning, as an extension to the scope of autonomous English learning. In addition, with the rising popularity of Web 2.0-inspired social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter and blogs, the concept of social networking should also be increasingly incorporated into language education, since it promotes online interactions among English learners, while facilitating the establishment of information sharing, data query, and learning partnership in the network learning community. Thus, this project exploits Web 2.0-based online learning as the framework to design freshman English materials fusing social learning elements, for the purpose of boosting students’ interests for enhanced learning effectiveness, expanding e-learning into s-learning.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 403-408)
• Pages: 1240-1243
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.403-408.1240
• Online since: November 2011
• Authors: Liang Yi Chung
• Keywords: Autonomous English Learning, Social Networking, Web 2.0 E-Learning

References

[1] O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2. 0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. O'Reilly Media.

[2] Shetzer, H. & Warschauer, M. (2000). A electronic literacy approach to network-based language teaching. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds. ), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. New York: Cambridge.

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139524735.010

[3] Downes, S. (2006). E-learning 2. 0. eLearn Magazine. Retrieved November 22, 2009, from http: /elearnmag. org/subpage. cfm?section=rticles&article=29-1.

[4] Anderson, T. (2007). Social Learning 2. 0. Retrieved 20, 2009, from http: /www. slideshare. net/terrya/educational-social-software-edmedia-2007.

[5] Wang, W., & Wang, C. (2009). An empirical study of instructor adoption of web-based learning systems. Computers & Education, 53(3), 761-774.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.02.021

[6] Hwang, G., Tsai, P., Tsai, C., & Tseng, J. (2008). A novel approach for assisting teachers in analyzing student web-searching behaviors. Computers & Education, 51(2), 926-938.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.011

[7] Karrer, T. (2006). eLearning 1. 0 vs. 2. 0 - help needed : ELearning technology. Retrieved March 12, 2008, from http: /elearningtech. blogspot. com/2006/09/elearning-10-vs-20-help-needed 07. html.

[8] .

[8] Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., & Meyer, I. (2010). Microblogs in higher education – A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? Computers & Education, 55(1), 92-100.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.006