Pretreatment of Data Fusion in FBG Temperature Sensing Network

Article Preview

Abstract:

After analyzing noise and disturbance in FBG temperature sensing network, three different kinds of statistical methods are processed in experiment as pretreatment to deal with inaccuracy of data fusion results caused by outliers. After replacing outliers with statistical estimated value of three methods respectively, weight minimum mean square error (WMMSE) algorithm is operated to fuse majorized data. Pretreatment makes full use of sensors’ data, meanwhile, accuracy and robustness of measurement system are enhanced. Variances of the fusion results indicate that pretreatment can improve fusion results significantly. Fusion variance without pretreatment is 2.9762, larger than mean value method’ variance 1.9525, median method’s 1.3341 and trimmed mean method’s 1.6016.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 403-408)

Pages:

2428-2431

Citation:

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. M. López Higuera, L. Rodriguez Cobo and A. Quintela Incera: Fiber Optic Sensors in Structural Health Monitoring, Lightwave Technol., Vol. 29(2011), pp.587-608.

DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2011.2106479

Google Scholar

[2] S. G. M. Kramer,B. Wiesent and M.S. Muller : Fusion of a FBG-based health monitoring system for wind turbines with a fiber-optic lightning detection system, Proceedings of the SPIE(2008), p. 70040O-1-4.

DOI: 10.1117/12.783602

Google Scholar

[3] Zhao Ming-fu, Wang Shao-fei and Bin-bin Luo et al.: Theoretical Study on the Cross Sensitivity of Fiber Bragg Grating Sensor Affected by Temperature and Transverse Pressure, in Photonics and Optoelectronic (SOPO), 2010 Symposium on, pp.1-4.

DOI: 10.1109/sopo.2010.5504445

Google Scholar

[4] Guo Hong-lei, Xiao Gao-zhi and N. Mrad, et al.: Fiber Optic Sensors for Structural Health Monitoring of Air Platforms, Sensors, Vol. 11(2011), pp.3687-3705.

DOI: 10.3390/s110403687

Google Scholar

[5] Deng Zi-li. Li Yun and Wang Xin : Multisensor optimal information fusion white noise deconvolution filter, Control Theory & Applications, Vol. 23(2006), pp.439-442.

DOI: 10.1109/wcica.2006.1712598

Google Scholar

[6] Su K. L, Jau Y. M, and Jeng J. T.: Modeling of Nonlinear Aggregation for Information Fusion Systems with Outliers Based on the Choquet Integral, Sensors, Vol. 11(2011), pp.2426-2446.

DOI: 10.3390/s110302426

Google Scholar

[7] P. Spichtinger,K. Gierens, and H.G. J Smit, et al.: On the distribution of relative humidity in cirrus clouds, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 4(2004), pp.639-647.

DOI: 10.5194/acp-4-639-2004

Google Scholar

[8] S. Kay: Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, Volume I: Estimation Theory (v. 1) ( Prentice Hall, 1993).

Google Scholar

[9] G. Frahm: Linear statistical inference for global and local minimum variance portfolios, Statistical Papers, Vol. 51(2010), pp.789-812.

DOI: 10.1007/s00362-008-0170-z

Google Scholar