Bubble Structures, Fishscaling Resistance and Adhesion of Vitreous Enamel to Low Carbon Steel

Abstract:

The bubble structures, fishscaling resistance, adhesion and its mechanism of vitreous enamel to low carbon steels were evaluated by microscopic methods. The results show that the microalloying elements deteriorates the adhesion but suppress the fishscaling tendency, the enamel-steel interface adhesion could be explained as mainly the mechanical interlocking and chemical bonding during the firing process; the lower carbon substrate causes higher proportion of bigger bubbles in the enamel layer and subsequently causes the lower fishscaling susceptibility.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 409)
• Pages: 736-742
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.409.736
• Online since: November 2011
• Authors: Ai Wen Zhang, Si Hai Jiao, Zheng Yi Jiang, Dong Bin Wei
• Keywords: Adhesion, Fishscaling Resistance, Interface Morphology, Vitreous Enamel

References

[1] X. Yang, A. Jha, R. Brydson, R.C. Cochrane: Mater. Sci. Eng. Vol. A 366 (2004), p.254.

[2] F.S. Shieu, K.C. Lin and J.C. Wong: Ceram. Int. Vol. 25 (1999), p.27.

[3] S.L. Larry: Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. Vol. 18 (1997), p.134.

[4] G.P. K. Chu, J.K. Magor and H.M. Davis: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 37 (1954), p.391.

[5] I. Takahashi, Y. Matsumoto and I. Aruga: Kawasaki Steel Technical Report Vol. 9 (1981), p.57.

[6] W. A. Deringer: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 26 (1943), p.151.

[7] D. Rithie, H.A. Schaeffer and D. White: J. Mater. Sci. Vol. 18 (1983), p.599.

[8] D.G. Moore, M.A. Mason and W.N. Harrison: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 35 (1952), p.33.

[9] X.M. Yuan: Mater. Sci. Eng. Vol. A 452-453 (2007), p.116.

[10] G. Papp, D. Geyer and G. Giedenbacher: Vitreous Enameller Vol. 41 (1990), p.71.

[11] B.W. King, H.P. Tripp and W.H. Duckworth: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 42 (1959), p.504.

[12] E. Paparazzo, G. Fierro and G.M. Ingo: J. Am. Ceram. Soc. Vol. 71 (1988), p. C494.