Comparing Study on Real Drawbead and Equivalent Drawbead Based on Finite Element Analysis

Xiao Gang Qiu; Hao Huang

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.430-432.1056

Paper Titles

Preparation of Nano-TiO₂and Performance Study on Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue
p.1040

HZSM-5 Zeolite Modified by Oxalic Acid and Photocatalytic Activity of Supported TiO₂
p.1044

Photocatalytic Degradation Glyphosate with Cerium and Nitrogen Co-Doped TiO₂ under Visible Irradiation
p.1048

To Discuss the New Century’s Recessive Knowledge Management of Teachers in Senior Schools
p.1052

Comparing Study on Real Drawbead and Equivalent Drawbead Based on Finite Element Analysis
p.1056

Investigation of Tube Drawing Process by Finite Element Simulation
p.1060

Experiment and Research on Mechanic Behavior of Concrete with Different Addition Amounts of Polypropylene Fibers
p.1064

A Novel Approach to Mine Knowledge from Social Images
p.1068

Finite Element Modal Analysis of the Frame of Corn Stubble-Collector
p.1072

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 430-432Comparing Study on Real Drawbead and Equivalent...

Comparing Study on Real Drawbead and Equivalent Drawbead Based on Finite Element Analysis

Abstract:

The dynamic explicit finite element software DYNAFORM was used to simulate the real and equivalent drawbead model. Analyzed the influence of the blank hold force (BHF) and virtual velocity on blank’s deformation behavior after passing through drawbead, compared the results of the FE simulation. The simulation results were confirmed by experiments. The study shows that the equivalent drawbead model can’t simulate the blank’s behavior precisely when it passing the real drawbeads, the effect of BHF on real drawbead model is larger than equal drawbead model; the proper range of virtual velocity was obtained at the same time.