Comparison and Analysis of Two Auditory Models Faced to Mechanical Faults Diagnosis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Auditory model is a signal analysis system with simulating the mechanism of the human auditory system, and it is not only suitable for speech signal but also vibration signal for mechanical faults diagnosis. In this paper, the work of analysis and comparison for EA and ZCPA auditory model is done. The reason and characteristics of simulation mode of auditory nerve in two auditory model is illustrated. By analyzing vibration signals of different rotor faults, the performances of distinguishing different faults and stability for one kind fault for two models are compared. The results show that ZCPA model is more flexible and stable.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 430-432)

Pages:

1081-1086

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yang X, Wang K, Shamma S.A. Auditory representations of acoustic signals[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information theory, 1992, 38(2): 824-839.

DOI: 10.1109/18.119739

Google Scholar

[2] Serajul H, Roberto T, Anthony Z. A temporal auditory model with adaptation for automatic speech recognition [J]. ICASSP'2007, 2007, 1141-1144.

Google Scholar

[3] Lisa G H, Leslie M C. Using computational auditory models to predict simultaneous masking data: model comparison[J]. IEEE Transactions on biomedical engineering, 1999, 46(12): 1432-1440.

DOI: 10.1109/10.804571

Google Scholar

[4] Klapuri A. Multipitch analysis of polyphonic music and speech signals using an auditory model[J]. IEEE Transactions on speech and audio processing, 2008, 16(2): 255-266.

DOI: 10.1109/tasl.2007.908129

Google Scholar

[5] Holmes S, Sumner C, O'Mard L P, Meddis R. The temporal representation of speech in a nonlinear model of the guinea pig cochlea [J]. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 2004, 116(6): 3534-354.

DOI: 10.1121/1.1815111

Google Scholar

[6] Chu W, Champagne B. A Simplified Early Auditory Model with Application in Speech/Music Classification [C] / IEEE CCECE/CCGEI, Ottawa, May 2006, 775-778.

Google Scholar

[7] Wang K. Shamma S. Self-normalization and noise- robustness in early auditory representations [J]. IEEE Transactions on speech and audio processing, 1994, 2(3): 421-435.

DOI: 10.1109/89.294356

Google Scholar

[8] Chu W, Champagne B. A noise-robust FFT-based auditory spectrum with application in audio classification[J]. IEEE Transactions on audio, speech, and language processing, 2008, 16(1): 137-150.

DOI: 10.1109/tasl.2007.907569

Google Scholar

[9] LI Yungong, ZHANG Jinping, DAI Li, ZHANG Zhanyi, LIU Jie. Auditory-Model-Based Feature Extraction Method for Mechanical Faults Diagnosis [J]. Chinese Journal Of Mechanical Engineering,2010, 21(3): 391-397.

DOI: 10.3901/cjme.2010.03.391

Google Scholar

[10] Doh-suk Kim, Soo-Young Lee, Rhee M Kil . Auditory processing of speech signal for robust speech recognition in real word noisy environments [J]. IEEE Transactions On Speech And Audio Processing, 1999, 1(7): 55-68.

DOI: 10.1109/89.736331

Google Scholar

[11] Serajul H, Roberto T, Anthony Z. Perceptual features for automatic speech recognition in noisy environments [J]. Speech Communication, 2009, 51(1): 58-75.

DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2008.06.002

Google Scholar