Relationship between Objective and Subjective Methods in Evaluating Static Discomfort of Car Driver Seat

Abstract:

Objective method alone is insufficient in measuring discomfort of car seats. It is indirect and does not truly convey the perception and feeling of the sitter. A combination of both objective and subjective method gives better evaluation on discomfort. Seat pressure distribution method was adopted to investigate the static characteristic of a seat. The method was found to be statistically repeatable in measuring sitting of fourteen male subjects in static condition. Subjective discomfort through subjective assessment using a valid and reliable self-established questionnaire together with a body pressure map (BPM) showed increasing discomfort as sitting time increase; which is expected. The short term seat pressure distribution was used to be correlated with subjective assessment. Significant and moderate correlation was observed between four local body parts namely the seat pan bolster, thighs, upper back and lower back with overall seat average pressure BPM used in the subjective evaluation. Multiple linear regression model were established; overall discomfort from averaged pressure from BPM can be predicted from right & left buttock, right & left thigh and upper back & lower back. It was found that R-Sq=93.5%, R-Sq (adj) = 83.7% with moderately adequate predictive ability with predicted R-Sq= 46.77%.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 433-440)
• Pages: 4997-5003
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.433-440.4997
• Online since: January 2012
• Authors: D.D.I Daruis, B.M. Deros, M.J.M. Nor, M. Hosseini Fouladi
• Keywords: Component, Discomfort, Discomfort Survey, Seat Pressure

References

[1] Z. Mohamed, R. M. Yusuff, and M. M. H. M. Ahmad, Automotive ergonomics: comparison of Malaysian and Japanese passenger cars interior dimension parameters, " in International Conference on Ergonomics Kuala Lumpur, 2007. URL: http: /www. ice2007. um. edu. my/modules/content/index. php, id=35.

[2] M. P. De Looze, L. F. M. Kuijt-evers, and J. Van Dieen, Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures, Ergonomics, vol. 46, 2003, pp.985-997, doi: 10. 1080/0014013031000121977.

DOI: 10.1080/0014013031000121977

[3] N. M. Dunk and J. P. Callaghan, Gender-based differences in postural responses to seated exposures, Clinical biomechanics, vol. 20, pp.1101-1110, 2005. doi: 10. 1016/j. clinbiomech. 2005. 07. 004.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.07.004

[4] D. E. Gyi and J. M. Porter, Interface pressure and the prediction of car seat discomfort., Applied Ergonomics., vol. 30, 1999, pp.99-107, doi: 10. 1016/S0003-6870(98)00018-0.

DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(98)00018-0

[5] M. Kolich and S. M. Taboun, Ergonomics modelling and evaluation of automobile seat comfort, Applied Ergonomics, vol. 39, 2004, pp.15-27, doi: 10. 1080/0014013042000193273.

DOI: 10.1080/0014013042000193273

[6] G. Kyung and M. A. Nussbaum, Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part II): relationship with and prediction from interface pressure., International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics., vol. 38, 2008, pp.526-538.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2007.08.011

[7] S. Na, S. Lim, H. Choi, and M. Chung, Evaluation of driver's discomfort and postural change using dynamic body pressure distribution, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 35, 2005, pp.1085-1096.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2005.03.004

[8] J. M. Porter, D. E. Gyi, and H. A. Tait, Interface pressure data and the prediction of driver discomfort in road trials., Applied Ergonomics., vol. 34, 2003 doi: 10. 1016/S0003-6870(03)00009-7.

DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(03)00009-7

[9] R. Zenk, C. Mergl, J. Hartung, O. Sabbah, and H. Bubb, Objectifying the comfort of car seats, SAE International, vol. 2006-01-1299, 2006. URL: http: /papers. sae. org/2006-01-1299.

DOI: 10.4271/2006-01-1299

[10] D. Mohamad, B. M. Deros, D. A. Wahab, D. D. I. Daruis, and A. R. Ismail, Integration of Comfort into a Driver's Car Seat Design Using Image Analysis, American Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 7, 2010, pp.937-942.

DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2010.937.942

[11] P. Wawrow and J. M. Cavanaugh, Lumbar support prominence and vertical postion measurement methods in an occupied seat, SAE International, vol. SAE2006-01-1300, 2006, pp.115-128, URL: http: /papers. sae. org/2006-01-1300.

DOI: 10.4271/2006-01-1300

[12] K. Kamijo, H. Tsujimara, H. Obara, and M. Katsumatu, Evaluation of seating comfort, SAE Technical Papers Series 820761, 1982, pp.1-6, URL: http: /papers. sae. org/820761.

DOI: 10.4271/820761

[13] B. Kurtz, W. Diebschlag, and F. Heidinger, Recommendations for ergonomic and climatic physiological vehicle seat design, J. Cellular Plastics vol. 25, 1989, pp.125-137, doi: 10. 1177/0021955X8902500203.

DOI: 10.1177/0021955x8902500203

[14] D. D. Harrison, S. O. Haqrrison, A. C. Croft, D. E. Harrison, and S. J. Troyanovich, Sitting biomechanics, Part II: Optimal car driver's seat and optimal driver's spinal model, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 23, 2000, pp.37-47.

DOI: 10.1067/mmt.2000.103476

[15] D. D. Harrison, S. O. Harrison, A. C. Croft, D. E. Harrison, and S. J. Troyanovich, Sitting biomechanics Part I: Review of the Literature, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 22, 1999, pp.594-609.

DOI: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70020-5