Just-In Time Production System Using Fuzzy Logic Approach and a Simulation Application

Article Preview

Abstract:

While firms are operating in a global competitive environment, they are subjected to changes because of the increased competitiveness and developed technologies. Therefore, this transformation process forces to produce with just-in-time production and low cost products or services and leads to customer satisfaction. Until today, competitive conditions, efficiency, productivity and quality of production, forced the firms to put more emphasis on production systems. Therefore, the firms are more interested in scientific analysis, planning and controlling of their production systems. As a result, one of the newest approaches is Just in Time (JIT) production system which emerged after WWII in Japan and aims to decrease the inventory cost and maximize the quality. The philosophy of this approach is to produce the necessary amount of production, when and where needed at the required quality. But JIT production system is weak in unclear species. For this purpose, the general and necessary solution is using fuzzy logic. In this paper we discussed about the simulation of an assembly line with 3 steps; firstly using Kanban production method, secondly non-using Kanban production method, and lastly using Kanban production method with fuzzy times. And also the comparisons of these steps will also be studied in this paper.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1029-1034

Citation:

Online since:

January 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y.G. Sandanayake, C.F. Oduoza and D.G. Proverbs: A systematic modelling and simulation approach for JIT performance optimization, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 24 (2008), p.735– 743.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2008.03.013

Google Scholar

[2] S.E. Kesen and O.F. Baykoc: Simulation of automated guided vehicle (AGV) systems based on just-in-time (JIT) philosophy in a job-shop environment, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 15 (2007), p.272–284.

DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2006.11.002

Google Scholar

[3] O.F. Baykoc and S. Erol: Simulation modelling and analysis of a JIT production system, Int. J. Production Economics 55 (1998), pp.203-212.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(98)00061-9

Google Scholar

[4] P.Y. Huang, L.P. Rees and B.W. Taylor III: A simulation analysis of the Japanese just-in-time technique (with Kanbans) for a multi-line, multi-stage production system, Decision Sciences 14(7), (1983), pp.326-343.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1983.tb00189.x

Google Scholar

[5] B.R. Sarkar and J.A. Fitzsimmons: The performance of push and pull systems: a simulation and comparative study, Int J Prod Res 27(10), (1989), p.1715–31.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Savsar: Effect of Kanban withdrawal policies and other factors on the performance of JIT systems: a simulation study, Int J Prod Res 34(10), (1996), p.2879–99.

DOI: 10.1080/00207549608905064

Google Scholar

[7] W. Wang, D. Wang and W.H. Ip: JIT production planning approach with fuzzy due date for OKP manufacturing systems, Int. J. Production Economics 58, (1999), pp.209-215.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(98)00122-4

Google Scholar

[8] A. Azadeh, B. Bidokhti and S.M.R. Sakkaki: Design of practical optimum JIT systems by integration of computer simulation and analysis of variance, Computers & Industrial Engineering 49, (2005), p.504–519.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2005.03.005

Google Scholar

[9] T.H. Hou and W.C. Hu: An integrated MOGA approach to determine the Pareto-optimal Kanban number and size for a JIT system. Expert Systems with Applications 38, (2011), p.5912–5918.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.032

Google Scholar

[10] C.H. Chu and W.I. Shih: Simulation studies in JIT production, Int J Prod Res 30(11), (1992), p.2573–86.

Google Scholar

[11] R.V. Demicco and G.J. Klir: Stratigraphic simulations using fuzzy logic to model sediment dispersal, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 31, (2001), p.135–155.

DOI: 10.1016/s0920-4105(01)00126-7

Google Scholar