Considerations on Decisions Making Process under the Risk of Terrorism

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper offers a decision making process based on terrorism risk. The purpose of the model is to support effective decision making in order to involve multiple potential targets and countermeasure alternatives. Because of the complexity of the issues and the posible catastrophic consequences of a terrorist attack, it is necesary to use an analytical tool to detect, assess, warn, response, and recovery the critical infrastructure. The perspective taken is that in order to establish priorities for threats and vulnerabilities and to identify and evaluate options for action.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 463-464)

Pages:

1002-1005

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B.J. Garrick, Perspectives on the use of risk assessment to address terrorism, in: Risk Analysis, 22(3), (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] R.L. Keeney, Modelling values for ant-terrorism analysis, in: Risk Analysis, 27(3): 585-596, (2007).

Google Scholar

[3] R.L. Dillon, R.M. Lieber, T. Bestafka, Risk-Based Decision Making for Terrorism Applications, in: Risk Analysis, vol. 29, no. 3 (2009).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01196.x

Google Scholar

[4] J.Y. Haimes, Risk Modeling, Assessment and Management, in: 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ Willey Publishing (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] D. Buckshaw, G.S. Parnell, W. Unkenholtz, D. Parks, J. Wallner, O. Saydjari, Mission-oriented risk and design analysis of critical information systems, in: Journal of Military Operations Research, 10(2): 19-38 (2005).

DOI: 10.5711/morj.10.2.19

Google Scholar

[6] M.G. Stewart: Risk-informed decision support for assessing the costs and benefits of counter-terrorism protective measures for infrastructure, in: International Journal of Critical Infrastructure protection, edited by Elsevier, no. 3 (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcip.2009.09.001

Google Scholar