Comparison of Oscillography Impact Properties between a New Type Drilling Collar Steel and 4145H

Article Preview

Abstract:

Average impact energy of 4145H steel and X new type drilling collar steel satisfied the standard of “SYT5144-2007 Drilling collar” and “API SPEC7”. With temperature getting down, impact energy of 4145H steel decreased, impact energy Cof X drilling collar steel is a lot higher than 4145H steel, crack propagation energy and crack propagation energy/impact energy ratio decreased. Lower temperature leads to higher crack propagation rate. The crack propagation energy of 4145H is lower than X drilling collar steel. The crack propagation energy/impact energy ratios of X drilling collar steel are at least 3% higher than 4145H for different temperature. In drilling, crack growth rate in X DC was slower than 4145H DC, crack growth rate was fast, and the DC was easy to fracture in low temperature

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 463-464)

Pages:

435-438

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Tang Zheng-hua, Fan Hong-yuan, Li Jing-yuan et-al. Development of Steel for Drill Collar AISI 4145H, Ordance Material Science and Engineering. 1997,20(2); 52~55.

Google Scholar

[2] Yang Zi-lin, You Hua-jiang, Jian Zong-cheng.Analysis of the cause for drill string failure accidents and the countermeasures.Nature Gas Industry. 2000; 20(3); 57~59.

Google Scholar

[3] GB/T19748-2005 Steel-Charpy V-notch pendulum impact test-instrumented test method. (2005).

DOI: 10.3403/02052562u

Google Scholar

[4] SYT5144-2007 Drill Collar. (2007).

Google Scholar

[5] API SPEC 7. Specification for rotary drill stem element. 40th ed. Washington(DC): API, 2001-11.

Google Scholar

[6] Wang Bin et-al. Predict ion of Crack Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) from the Instrumented Impact Test Based on the Local Approach, Journal of Materials Science & Engineering. 2009, 27(6), 946-948.

Google Scholar

[7] Schindler, H.J., Estimation of the dynamic J-R curve from a single impact bend-ing test, Proc. 11th European Conf. on Fracture, Poitiers, 1996, EMAS, London, p.2007-(2012).

Google Scholar

[8] Yu Zai-song et-al. Crack Growth and Propagation Mechanisms of Impact Crack in the Instrumented Impact Test. Foundry Technology. 2008, 29(5), 617-621.

Google Scholar

[9] Schindler, H. J and Tipping, Ph. "Proposed Method for Instrumented Precracked Charpy-Type Tests, Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (HSK) Report No. HSK-AN-425, Rev. 3, May (2001).

Google Scholar

[10] Zhang Lan et-al. Study on Oscillography Impact Property of AZ31 Magnesium and Its TIG Welded Joints. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2009, 38(3), 175-180.

Google Scholar