Projective Synchronization of a Modified Coupled Dynamos System

Abstract:

Based on techniques from the state observer design and the pole placement technique, we present a systematic design procedure to synchronize a modified coupled dynamos system by a scaling factor ( projective synchronization ). Compared with the method proposed by Wen and Xu, this method eliminates the nonlinear item from the output of the drive system. Furthermore, the scaling factor can be adjusted arbitrarily in due course of control without degrading the controllability. Finally, feasibility of the technique is illustrated for the unified chaotic system.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 466-467)
• Pages: 1261-1265
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.466-467.1261
• Online since: February 2012
• Authors: Chun Mei Wang, Ren Long Chang
• Keywords: Modified Coupled Dynamos System, Pole Placement Technique, Projective Synchronization, State Observer

References

[1] Pecora L M, Carroll T L. Synchronization in chaotic systems. Physical Review Letters, 1990, 64(8): 821~827.

[2] Carroll T L, Pecora L M. Synchronizing chaotic circuits. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 1991, 38(4): 453~456.

DOI: 10.1109/31.75404

[3] Chen G, Dong X. From chaos to order: methodologies, perspectives and applications. Singapore: World Scientific, 1998, 12~27.

[4] Wang G R, Yu X L, Chen S G. Chaotic control, synchronization and utilizing. Beijing: National Defence Industry Press, 2001, 281~455.

[5] Wang X Y. Chaos in the complex nonlinearity system. Bejjing: Electronics Industry Press, 2003, 91~113.

[6] Mainieri R, Rehacek J. Projective synchronization in three-dimensional chaotic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1999, 82(15-12): 3042~3045.

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.82.3042

[7] Xu D L, Li Z. Controlled projective synchronization in nonpartially-linear chaotic systems. Int. J. Bifur. Chaos, 2002, 12(6): 1395~1402.

DOI: 10.1142/s0218127402005170

[8] Kim C M, Rim S H, Key W. Anti-synchronization of chaotic oscillators. Phys. Lett. A, 2003, 320(1): 39~46.

[9] Hu J, Chen S H, Chen L. Adaptive control for anti-synchronization of Chua's chaotic system. Phys. Lett. A, 2005, 339(6): 455~460 Fig 1 The chaotic attractor of system (6) (a) the time response of x1(t) and y1(t) (b) the time response of x2(t) and y2(t) (c) the time response of x3(t) and y3(t) (d)the error signals e1(t), e2(t) and e3(t) Fig2 The simulation result of system (7) and (8) when (a) the time response of x1(t) and y1(t) (b) the time response of x2(t) and y2(t) (c)the time response of x3(t) and y3(t) (d) the error signals e1(t), e2(t) and e3(t) Fig3 The simulation result of system (7) and (8) when (a) the time response of x1(t) and y1(t) (b) the time response of x2(t)and y2(t) (c)the time response of x3(t)and y3(t) (d) the error signals e1(t), e2(t) and e3(t) Fig 4 The simulation result of system (7) and (8) when.

DOI: 10.1515/9783112347485-017