Numerical Simulation and Response Surface Optimization of Oil-Gas Separator

Chang Dong Wan

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.466-467.396

Paper Titles

The Optimization of Parameters in Refining Process Based on LINGO Software
p.376

Effect of Polyvinylpyrrolidone Ratio on Synthesis of High Concentration Nano-Silver Colloid
p.381

The Synthesis and Performance Study of Complex of Calcium(II) and Maleic Amide Acid
p.386

Preparation and Mechanical Properties of Zein/PVA Nanofibrous Membranes
p.391

Numerical Simulation and Response Surface Optimization of Oil-Gas Separator
p.396

Accuracy Comparison of Elastic Impedance Formula
p.400

Effect of the Lactide/Glycolide Ratio and Molecular Weight of PLGA on the Bovine BMPs Microspheres Systems
p.405

Applied Research of Pantograph Carbon Slide Formulation Optimization Based on Genetic Neural Network
p.411

Computer Simulation of Transmission Line Model for Landfill Leakage Location
p.416

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 466-467Numerical Simulation and Response Surface...

Numerical Simulation and Response Surface Optimization of Oil-Gas Separator

Abstract:

CFD (computational fluid dynamics) is a good method for simulation of the oil-gas separator. When the volume concentration is less than 10%, the oil particle tracks can be simulated by DPM （Discrete Phase Model）. The results show that the separation efficiency is obviously affected by the diameter of separator air-outlet, the diameter of separator oil-outlet, and the angle of separator cone. But the quantified analysis on separation efficiency is difficultly brought forward by CFD. RSM (response surface methods) can help to identify factors influencing the responses by experiments. Finally, the optimum responses and design parameters will be obtained altogether.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 466-467)

Pages:

396-399

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.466-467.396

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2012

Authors:

Chang Dong Wan

Keywords:

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), Oil-Gas Separator, Response Surface Method (RSM)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Alex. C. Hoffmann and Louis E. Stein. Gas cyclones and swirl tubes: principles, design and operation, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2002, p.30–78.

Google Scholar

[2] Hill W J, Hunter W G. A review of response surface methodology . Technometrics, 1966, pp.571-590.

Google Scholar

[3] Box, G. E. P., and Behnken, D. W., Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables, Technometrics, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1960, pp.435-475.

DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912

Google Scholar

[4] Wu, C. F. Jeff, and Hamada, Michael, Experiments: Planning, Analysis and Parameter Design Optimization, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, (2000).

Google Scholar

[5] Chuanyu Zhu, The Numerical Simulation Research of Effects of Interior Structures Deformation on Characteristic of Cyclone Separator, . Dalian University of Technology, 2006, pp.13-28.

Google Scholar

[6] Sui Yunkang, Zhang Xuan, Yu Huiping. Improvement and Application on Response Surface Methodology in Shape Optimization, Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2008, pp.31-36.

Google Scholar