Study of Variation Equivalence in Machining Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, the variation equivalence problem in machining process is investigated. First, the variation equivalence model is introduced to study the equivalent transformation among different variation sources. Then we propose a concept of maximum possible variation equivalence area, based on which an approach to estimating the possibility of occurrence of the variation equivalence phenomenon is given. An example is presented to illustrate the proposed approaches.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 468-471)

Pages:

1257-1261

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Q. Huang, J. Shi, J. Yuan, Part dimensional error and its propagation modeling in multi-operational machining processes, Journal of manufacturing science and engineering. 125 (2003), 255-262.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1532007

Google Scholar

[2] H. Wang, Q. Huang, Reuven Katz, Multi-operational machining processes modeling for sequential root cause identification and measurement reduction, Transactions of the ASME. 127 (2005), 512-521.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1948403

Google Scholar

[3] H. Wang, Q. Huang, Error cancellation modeling and its application to machining process control, IIE Transactions. 38 (2006), 379-388.

DOI: 10.1080/07408170500333392

Google Scholar

[4] S. Chen, H. Wang, Q. Huang, Diagnosis of multiple error sources under variation equivalence, NAMRI/SME Transactions, 38 (2010).

Google Scholar

[5] I.T. Jolliffe, Principal component analysis, second ed., Springer series in statistics, 2002.

Google Scholar

[6] J. Shi, Stream of variation modeling and analysis for multistage manufacturing process, CRC Press, 2006.

Google Scholar

[7] Khan, A., Ceglarek, D., and Ni, J., "Sensor location optimization for fault diagnosis in multi-fixture assembly systems," ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 120 (1998), p.781–792.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2830221

Google Scholar