Influence Analysis of Coupled Neutronics and Thermo-Hydraulics on Steady-State Characteristics of Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactor

Article Preview

Abstract:

the coulped neutronics and thermo-hydraulics model for supercritical water-cooled reactor (SCWR) is developed by internal coupling method. It is based on the two group neutron diffusion equations and the one-dimensional junction thermal analysis mode, in which the cross sections used for SCWR are generated by Dragon tool. Compared with the calculation results based on the non-coupling calculation model, the steady state characteristics under coupling calculation condition are detailed analyzed by considering parameters feedback at each axial node. The results show that, as coupled model is chosen its axial power distribution would give an obvious deviation from the cosine function that used for non-coupled model. Although the cladding temperature at most of the axial nodes rises with a shifted power peak, the maximum cladding temperature is finally decreased. For the above coupling condition, the maximum cladding temperature would appear at the external assemblies with lower coolant temperature but not at inner assemblies with higher coolant temperature. As the detailed description for coupling characteristics of supercritical water-cooled reactor is given, a certain theory reference for its system safety could be provided.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 472-475)

Pages:

278-283

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Yamaji, Y. Oka, S. Koshizuka. In: Journal of nuclear science and technology. Vol. 42 (2005), pp.8-19.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Yoo, Y. Ishiwatari, Y. Oka, etc. In: Annals of Nuclear Energy. Vol. 33 (2006), p: 945-956.

Google Scholar

[3] L. Monti, J. Starflinger, T. Schulenberg. In: Nuclear Engineering and Design. Vol. 241 (2011), p: 1579-1591.

Google Scholar

[4] Z.Q. Liu, Z.M. Jiang, X.F. Jiang, etc. In: Chinese journal of nuclear science and engineering. Vol. 29 (2009), p: 16-21.

Google Scholar

[5] P. An, D. Yao. In: Nuclear power engineering. Vol. 31 (2010), p: 52-55. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[6] K. Ivanov, M. Avramova. In: Annals of nuclear energy. Vol. 34 (2009), p: 501-513.

Google Scholar

[7] K. Kamei, A. Yamaji, Y. Ishiwatari, etc. In: Journal of nuclear science and technology, Vol. 43 (2006), p: 129-139.

Google Scholar

[8] Z.S Xie. In: Nuclear Reactor Physics Analysis, edited by XI'AN Jiaotong University Press and Atomic Energy Press, Xi'an, Beijing (2004), in press. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[9] P. A. Yu, R.A Zhu, Z.W Yu, etc. In: Nuclear reactor thermal hydraulic analysis, edited by Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai (2002), in press. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[10] W. Jäger, V. H. S. Espinoza, etc. In: Nuclear engineering and design, Vol. 241 (2011), p: 2184-2203.

Google Scholar

[11] Z.Y. Li, T. Zhou, C.H. Sun. In: Nuclear Power Engineering, Vol. 32 (2011), p: 52-57. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar