New Fault Isolation Method during Functional Test in Manufacturing

Article Preview

Abstract:

Stop Clock Design-for-Testability (DFT) and Scan Dump DFT are integrated and implemented to trap the digital logic inside combinational and sequential logics for fault isolation (FI) purpose. Both DFTs enable functional test result to be dumped out structurally during functional test at manufacturing. Validation is performed on RTL simulation using test pattern and it is shown that the real silicon data matched the simulation results. Hence a new FI method has been established on the fly, capable in manufacturing.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 479-481)

Pages:

2572-2576

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N. Ahmed, M. Tehranipoor and V. Jayaram, in: Timing-based delay test for screening small delay defects, Proc. Design Automation Conf. (2006), pp.320-325.

DOI: 10.1145/1146909.1146993

Google Scholar

[2] X. Lin et al., in: Timing aware ATPG for high quality at-speed testing of small delay defects, Proc. Asian Test Symposium, (2006), pp.139-146.

DOI: 10.1109/ats.2006.261012

Google Scholar

[3] P.C. Maxwell, I. Hartanto and L. Bentz, in: Comparing functional and structural tests, Proc. ITC, (2000), pp.400-407.

Google Scholar

[4] P. A. Thaker et al., in: Register-transfer level fault modeling and test evaluation techniques for VLSI circuits, Proc. ITC, (2000), pp.940-949.

DOI: 10.1109/test.2000.894305

Google Scholar

[5] F. Corno, M. S. Reorda and G. Squillero, in: RT-level ITC'99 benchmarks and first ATPG results, IEEE Design & Test of Computers Vol. 17 (2000), pp.44-53.

DOI: 10.1109/54.867894

Google Scholar

[6] H. Fang, K. Chakrabarty and H. Fujiwara, in: RTL DFT Techniques to Enhance Defect Coverage for Functional Test Sequences, IEEE Int. High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop, (2009), pp.160-165.

DOI: 10.1109/hldvt.2009.5340161

Google Scholar

[7] G. Perry : DFT and Simulation Techniques for Digital Test (Soft Test Inc., Florida 2008).

Google Scholar

[8] Z. Qian, F. Siegelin, B. Tippelt and S. Muller, in: Localization and physical analysis of a complex SRAM failure in 90nm technology, Microelectronics Reliability Vol. 46 No. 9-11 (2006), pp.1558-1562.

DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2006.07.020

Google Scholar

[9] Information on http://www.actel.com/documents/3200DX_IEEE_Std_AN.pdf

Google Scholar

[10] D. P. Vallett, in: Failure analysis requirements for nanoelectronics, IEEE Trans. On Nanotechnology, Vol. 1 No. 3 (2002), pp.117-121.

DOI: 10.1109/tnano.2002.806826

Google Scholar

[11] Information on http://www-unix.ecs.umass.edu/~bdatta/IO_testing_paper.ppt.

Google Scholar

[12] Information on http://www1.verigy.com/cntrprod/groups/public/documents/file/wcmd_001348.pdf

Google Scholar

[13] M. E. Levitt, in: Designing Ultrasparc for testability, IEEE on Design & Test of Computers, Vol. 14 No. 1 (1997), pp.10-17.

DOI: 10.1109/54.573352

Google Scholar

[14] S. K. Goel and B. Vermeulen, in: Hierarchical Data invalidation analysis for scan-based debug on multiple-clock system chips, Int. Test Conf (2002), pp.1103-1110.

DOI: 10.1109/test.2002.1041867

Google Scholar

[15] D. Josephon S. Poehlman and V. Govan, in: Debug Methodology for the McKinley Processor, Int. Test Conf. (2001), pp.451-460.

Google Scholar

[16] K. Anjali, in: Towards reducing "functional only" fails for the UltraSparctm Microprocessor, Int. Test Conf. (1999), pp.147-154.

Google Scholar