Principal Factors Preventing CER: Behavior Angle

Article Preview

Abstract:

Studies on principal factors preventing CER (China Environmental Risk) from Behavior Angle are seldom found, so we studied principal factors preventing CER from Behavior Angle, including their selection, contribution and sequence in this thesis. By our analysis, principal factors preventing CER from Behavior Angle can be ordered by contribution as follows: production waste disposal, living waste disposal, market management, public management, natural cause, living action, and production action. And our related advice is as follows: first, careful protection of natural environment. Secondly strict surveillance on production of waste from such behaviors as enterprise production and human living action by market management and public management, etc.. And thirdly great encouragement to arouse interest in technological innovations friendly with the environment in waste disposal, etc..

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 482-484)

Pages:

2065-2069

Citation:

Online since:

February 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L. H. Wang, J. B. Ding: Journal of EMCC. Vol. 20, No. 1 (2010), pp.66-70. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] L. H. Zheng: Environment and Ecology in the Three Gorges. No. 2 (2009), pp.59-62. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] M. E. Kraft: Policy Studies Journal. Vol. 28, No. 1 (2000), pp.206-218.

Google Scholar

[4] V. K. Smith, W. H. Desvousges: Land Economics. Vol. 64, No. 3 (1988), pp.211-219.

Google Scholar

[5] K. M. Branch, J. A. Bradbury: The Policy Studies Journal. Vol. 34, No. 4 (2006), pp.723-753.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Scott: Chemical Week. May 25/June1 (2005), p.16.

Google Scholar

[7] L. Roberts, A. Weale: Innovation and Environmental Risk (Belhaven, 1991).

Google Scholar

[8] R. W. England: Kyklos. Vol. 41, No. 3 (1988), pp.379-395.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Shogren: Risk Analysis (1998), pp.310-315.

Google Scholar

[10] K. M. Branch, J. A. Bradbury: The Policy Studies Journal. Vol. 34, No. 4 (2006), pp.723-753.

Google Scholar