Finite Element and Experimental Investigation of Human Femur Cortical Bone Microdamage during Radial Fretting

Article Preview

Abstract:

Accumulation of microdamage can result in increased bone fragility and osteoporotic fracture in human bone.Microcracks in bone have been implicated in the development of stress fractures.The goal of this study was to investigate the human femur cortical bone microdamage during radial fretting and its stress and strain distribution. Modeling and analysis were taken for Haversian system using FEM soft. Analytical results indicated that stress concentration which occurred in the haversian canal and around circumferential lamellas and through the circumferential lamellas and the interstitial tissues could lead to microcrack initiation of multi-areas. In addition, microcrack could occur as a result of a rather large plastic area which crossed interstitial bone and connected adjacent osteon under high load condition. In the meantime, radial fretting behaviors of the fresh human axial femur compact bone were investigated under a flat-on-ball configuration in high accuracy hydraulic servo fretting experimental machine. The kinetics behaviors of the compact bone were revealed by the F-D curves. The surface damage was analyzed combined with the examinations by laser confocal scanning microscopy (LCSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) . The morphologies showed that the microcracks were the primary damage form.The results showed that three typical types of cracks-radial microcrackannular microcrack and linking microcrack were observed. The test results and the FEM analysis results were of good consistency, and brought forth that most of microcracks run between the surrounding interstitial bone and the cement line.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

313-320

Citation:

Online since:

March 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Frost HL: Presence of microscopic cracks in vi in bone. Henry Ford Hospital Medical Bulletin 1 (1960), 8, 25–35.

Google Scholar

[2] BurrDB, MilgromC, BoydRD, HigginsWL: Experimental stress fractures of the tibia. Biological and mechanical aetiology in rabbits. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery -British Volume (1990), 72B, 3705.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.72b3.2341429

Google Scholar

[3] Burr D: Microdamage and bone strength. Osteoporos Int (2003), 14(Suppl 5), 67–72.

Google Scholar

[4] Frost HM: Micropetrosis. J Bone Jt Surg (1960), 42A, 144–50.

Google Scholar

[5] Mashiba T, Turner CH, Hirano T, Forwood MR, JohnstonCC, BurrDB: Effects of suppressed bone turnover by bisphosphonates on micro- damage accumulation and biomechanical properties in clinically relevant skeletal sites in beagles. Bone (2001).

DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(01)00414-8

Google Scholar

[6] Martin RB, Burr BD, Sharkey NA: Skeletal tissue mechanics. Springer-Verlag: New York (1998).

Google Scholar

[7] Pidaparti R M, Vog A: Experimental investigation of Poisson's ratio as a damage parameter for bone fatigue. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research(2002), 232-287.

Google Scholar

[8] Buur D B, Turner C H, Naick P, Forwood M R, Ambrosins W, Hasan M S, Pidaparti R: Does microdamage accumulation affect the mechanical properties of bone? J Biomechanics(1998), 31(4).

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00016-5

Google Scholar

[9] Mori S, Burr D B: Increased intracortical remodeling following fatigue damage. Bone (1993), 14(2), 103-109.

DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(93)90235-3

Google Scholar

[10] Taylor M: Two dimensional finite element simulation of the fatigue failure of cancellous bone: A preliminary study. In: Prendergast P J ed. 12th Couference of European Society of Biomechanics, Duben, Ireland(2000), 47-48.

Google Scholar

[11] Gibeling J.C., Shelton D.R., Malik,C. L: Application of fracture mechanics to the study of crack propagation in bone. In: Rack, H., Lesuer, D., Taleff, E. (Eds. ), Structural Biomaterials for the 21st Century. TMS, Warrendale, PA, pp. (2001).

Google Scholar

[12] Nalla R.K., Kruzic J.J., Kinney J.H., Ritchie R.O.,: Aspects of in vitro fatigue in human cortical bone: time and cycle dependent crack growth. Biomaterials (2005), 26, 2183-2195.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.05.024

Google Scholar

[13] Akkus,O., Rimnac,C. M: Cortical bone tissue resists fatigue fracture by deceleration and arrest of microcrack growth. Journal of Biomechanics (2001), 34, 757-764.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(01)00025-2

Google Scholar

[14] Zioupos,P., Wang X.T., Currey,J. D: The accumula- tion of fatigue microdamage in human cortical bone of two different ages invitro. Clinical Biomechanics (1996), 11, 365-375.

DOI: 10.1016/0268-0033(96)00010-1

Google Scholar

[15] Fazzalari N.L., Kuliwaba J.S., Forwood,M. R: Canc-ellous bone microdamage in the proximal femur: influence of age and osteoarthritis on damage morphology and regional distribution. Bone (2002), 31, 697-702.

DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00906-7

Google Scholar

[16] O'Brien F.J., Taylor,D., Lee T.C.: Microcrack accumulation at different intervals during fatigue testing in compact bone. Journal of Biomechanics (2003), 36, 973-980.

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00066-6

Google Scholar

[17] S. Mohsin,F. J. O'Brien and T. C. Lee: Osteonal crack barriers in ovine compact bone. J. Anat. (2006), 208, 81-89.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00509.x

Google Scholar

[18] Huang J, Haftka RT, Garita B, Rapoff AJ: Understanding the role of osteons in arresting cracks in cortical bones. Proceedings of bioengineering conference. Key Biscayne, FL: ASME( 2003).

Google Scholar

[19] Ashman et al : Representative cortical bone engineering constants . Journal of Biomechanics (1984).

Google Scholar