An Analysis of the Influence of Cutting Parameters on the Turning Process on the Fatigue Life of Aluminum Alloy UNS A92024-T351

Article Preview

Abstract:

Generally, metal structural elements of aircraft are placed in zones of critical load; in most cases, these elements are manufactured by machining processes. The fatigue life of these components is an important dynamic property that may be strongly affected by the surface condition produced during machining. In this paper a preliminary study of the influence of cutting parameters on fatigue strength of parts machined in aeronautical aluminum alloy UNS A92024-T351 has been carried out. Special attention has been provided to the relationship with surface finish evaluated through the roughness average.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

19-24

Citation:

Online since:

April 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.H. El-Axir: Int. J. of Mach. Tools & Manuf. Vol. 42 (2002), p.1055–1063.

Google Scholar

[2] D. Novovic, R.C. Dewes, D.K. Aspinwall, W. Voice and P. Bowen: : Int. J. of Mach. Tools & Manuf. Vol. 44 (2004), p.125–134.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Javidi , U. Rieger and W. Eichlseder: Int. J. of Fatigue Vol. 30 (2008), p.2050–(2055).

Google Scholar

[4] M. Field and J.F. Kahles: The Surface Integrity of Machined and Ground High Strength Steels, DMIC Report 210: 54–77 (1964).

Google Scholar

[5] I.S. Jawahir , E. Brinksmeier, R. M'Saoubi, D.K. Aspinwall, J.C. Outeiro , D. Meyer , D. Umbrello and A.D. Jayal: CIRP Annals – Manuf. Tech. Vol. 60(2) (2011), pp.603-626.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.002

Google Scholar

[6] J.P. Davim: Surface Integrity in Machining (Springer, London 2009).

Google Scholar

[7] ASTM E399-93: Standard test methods for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic material.

Google Scholar

[8] A. Merati: Int. J. of Fat. Vol. 27 (2005), p.33–44.

Google Scholar

[9] J.J. Schubbe: Eng. Frac. Mech. Vol. 76 (2009), p.1037–1048.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Marcos, M.A. Sebastián, J.P. Contreras, M. Sánchez-Carrilero , M. Sánchez and J.M. Sánchez-Sola: J. of Mat. Process. Tech. Vol. 162–163 (2005), p.644–648.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.061

Google Scholar

[11] J.F. Kelly and M.G. Cotterell: J. of Mat. Process. Tech. Vol. 120 (2002), p.327–334.

Google Scholar

[12] E.M. Rubio, A.M. Camacho, J.M. Sánchez-Sola and M. Marcos: J. of Mat. Process. Tech. Vol. 162–163 (2005), p.682–689.

Google Scholar

[13] M.S. Carrilero, R. Bienvenido, J.M. Sánchez, M. Álvarez, A. González and M. Marcos: Int. J. of Mach. Tools & Manuf. Vol. 42 (2002), p.215–220.

Google Scholar

[14] M.A. Sebastian, J.M. Sánchez, M.S. Carrilero, J.M. González and M. Marcos: Int. J. for Manuf. Sci. and Prod. Vol. 4 (2002), pp.181-188.

Google Scholar

[15] M.A. Sebastian, J.M. Sánchez, M.S. Carrilero, J.M. González, M. Alvarez and M. Marcos: Int. J. for Manuf. Sci. and Prod. Vol. 4 (2002), pp.211-220.

Google Scholar