Analysis of Technological Factors in Open Die Forging by Comparison of Different Analysis Methods

F.J. Olivares; Ana Maria Camacho; Miguel Ángel Sebastián

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.498.31

Paper Titles

A Method for Obtaining Spur Gears from Nanostructured Materials
p.7

A Proposal for Bending Process of TRIP Steel Sheets Based on the Springback Behavior
p.13

An Analysis of the Influence of Cutting Parameters on the Turning Process on the Fatigue Life of Aluminum Alloy UNS A92024-T351
p.19

Analysis of Cutting Forces during Dry Turning Processes of UNS A92024-T3 Aluminium Bars
p.25

Analysis of Technological Factors in Open Die Forging by Comparison of Different Analysis Methods
p.31

Application of Laser Texturization to Increase the Depth of AA5083 Welds
p.37

Approach to the Study of Workpiece Damage in Drilling of Carbon Fiber Composites by Using Thermography IR
p.43

Comparison between a Laser Micrometer and a Touch Trigger Probe for Workpiece Measurement on a CNC Lathe
p.49

Cutting Tool Selection through Tool Wear, Cost, Power Consumption and Surface Roughness Analyses
p.55

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 498Analysis of Technological Factors in Open Die...

Analysis of Technological Factors in Open Die Forging by Comparison of Different Analysis Methods

Abstract:

The scope of this work is to study a forging process at room temperature and at macroscopic level. The mechanism of deformation is influenced by the friction and the reduction ratio, but the influence of the geometry of the billet (aspect ratio) needs also to be taken into account. The objective will be to compare the results obtained during a simulation with the code based on Finite Element Method (DEFORM 2D/3D), with those obtained by analytical methods in order to validate the numerical model. Taking into account that deformation is not uniform and the free surface suffers a phenomenon known as barrel-shaped, that is not covered by analytical methods, the data obtained will compared with those obtained with the FEM code ABAQUS. The aim of this comparison between analytical and numerical methods using two commercial codes instead one, is a proposed way to validate a Finite Element simulation when experimental data are not available or do not exist yet.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Materials Processing Technologies, MESIC2011

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 498)

Pages:

31-36

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.498.31

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

April 2012

Authors:

F.J. Olivares, Ana Maria Camacho, Miguel Ángel Sebastián

Keywords:

Finite Element Method (FEM), Forging, Simulation, Slab Method

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Z. J Zhang, G.Z. Dai, S.N. Wu, L.X. Dong and L.L. Liu: Mat. Sci. and Eng. Vol. A499 (2009), pp.49-52.

Google Scholar

[2] S. H Zang, Z. R Wang, Z.T. Wang, Y. Xu and K. B Chen: J. of Mat. Process. Techn. Vol. 151 (2004), pp.39-47.

Google Scholar

[3] K. Osakada: J. of Mat. Process. Tech. Vol. 210 (2010), p.1436–1454.

Google Scholar

[4] C. McCormack and J. Monaghan: J. of Mat. Process. Tech. Vol. 118 (2001), pp.286-292.

Google Scholar

[5] C. McCormack and J. Monaghan: J. of Mat. Process. Tech. Vol. 127 (2002), p.48–56.

Google Scholar

[6] C.S. Cetinarslan: Mat. and Des. Vol. 28 (2007), p.1907–(1913).

Google Scholar

[7] A. Ghaei and M.R. Movahhedy: J. of Mat. Process. Tech. Vol. 182 (2007), p.534–539.

Google Scholar

[8] N. Biba, S. Stebounov and A. Lishiny: J. of Mat. Process. Tech. Vol. 113 (2001), pp.34-39.

Google Scholar

[9] Z.C. Sun and H. Yang: Mat. Sci. and Eng. Vol. A527 (2010), p.3464–3471.

Google Scholar

[10] G. Y Tzou, H. Hsu and H. Hsiao: J. of Mat. Process. Tech. Vol. 177 (2006), pp.150-153.

Google Scholar

[11] D. W Zhang, H. Yang and Z. C: J. of Mat. Process. Tech. Vol. 210 (2010) p.258–266.

Google Scholar