Effect of Molecular Sizes, Sources of Chitosan and Plasticizer Types on Properties of Carboxymethyl Chitosan Films

Article Preview

Abstract:

Carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCH) from two molecular sizes (oligomer and polymer) and three different sources (shrimp, crab and squid) of chitosan were prepared by carboxymethylation reaction. The CMCH films were cast and their mechanical properties. For molecular sizes, the polymer CMCH films showed higher %elongation (%E) than those of oligomer CMCH films but had no effect on tensile strength (TS). The crab polymer CMCH films showed the highest TS. The different sources of chitosan had no influence on %E of CMCH films. The effect of plasticizers [glycerol (Gly), sorbitol (Sor) and polyethylene glycol 400 (PEG)] on mechanical properties of CMCH films was also investigated. Additions of Gly and Sor into films increased %E and reduced TS of CMCH films; however, films plasticizing with PEG showed no significant difference in mechanical properties. The crab CMCH films were selected to determine water vapor transmission rate (WVTR) at 25°C and 65%RH. The crab oligomer CMCH films showed higher WVTR than those of crab polymer CMCH films. Addition of Sor as plasticizer decreased WVTR of crab polymer and oligomer CMCH films whereas WVTR of films with Gly depended on molecular sizes of chitosan. Addition of PEG had no effect on WVTR of CMCH films.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

611-614

Citation:

Online since:

April 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L.S. González, C.G. Martínez, A. Chiralt and M. Cháfer: J. Food Eng. Vol. 98 (2010), p.443.

Google Scholar

[2] F.R.D. Abreu and S. P. Campana-Filho: Carbohyd. Polym. Vol. 75 (2009), p.214.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Jayakumar a, M. Prabaharan, S.V. Nair, S. Tokura, H. Tamura and N. Selvamurugan: Prog. Mater. Sci. Vol. 55 (2010), p.675.

Google Scholar

[4] L. Chen, Y. Du and X. Zeng: Carbohyd. Res. Vol. 338 (2003), p.333.

Google Scholar

[5] R.A.A. Muzzarelli: Carbohyd. Polym. Vol. 8 (1988), p.1.

Google Scholar

[6] G. M. Pavlov, E.V. Korneeva, S. E. Harding and G. A. Vichoreva: Polymer Vol. 39 (1998), p.6951.

Google Scholar

[7] P. Bordes, E. Pollet and L. Avrous: Prog. Polym. Sci. Vol. 4 (2) (2009), p.125.

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Zhang and J.H. Han: J Food Sci. Vol. 71 (2) (200), p.109.

Google Scholar

[9] N.E. Suyatma, L. Tighzert and A. Copinet: J. Agr. Food Chem. Vol. 53 (10) (2005), p.3950.

Google Scholar

[10] P. Rachtanapun and R. Suriyatem: J. Agri. Sci. Tech. Vol. 2 (1A) (In press, 2012).

Google Scholar

[11] P. Rachtanapun, R. Suriyatem: Food Hydrocolloid (submitted). (2011).

Google Scholar

[12] P. Rachtanapun, S. Luangkamin, K. Tanprasert, R. Suriyatem: LWT-Food Sci Technol. (Submitted). (2011).

Google Scholar

[13] ASTM: Sandard test methods for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. vol. D882 ASTM, USA, (1995).

Google Scholar

[14] P. Rachtanapun and W. Tongdeesoontorn: Kasetsart J.: Nat. Sci. Vol. 43 (2009), p.252.

Google Scholar

[15] ASTM: Standard test methods for water vapor transmission of material. vol. E96. ASTM, USA, (1993).

Google Scholar

[16] P. Rachtanapun: Chiang Mai J. Sci. Vol. 34 (2) (2007), p.1.

Google Scholar

[17] S. Chillo, S. Flores, M. Mastromatteo, A. Conte, Lı´a Gerschenson and M.A. Del Nobile: J. Food Eng. Vol. 88 (2008), p.159.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.02.002

Google Scholar

[18] M.G.A. Vieira, M.A. Silva, L.O. Santos and M.M. Beppu. Eur Polm J. Vol. 47 (2011), p.254.

Google Scholar

[19] N. Gontard, S. Guilbert and J.L. Cuq: J. Food Sci. Vol. 58 (1993), p.206.

Google Scholar