Measuring the Environmental Stress: Indicators and Application

Article Preview

Abstract:

The sustainability of a nation’s social and economic development is fundamentally determined by how much the nation’s environmental system is strained by human activities, which is in turn determined by the pressure/burden created by human activities and the carrying capacity of the nation’s environment. Based on the material flows of an economy’s metabolism and the carrying capacity of the environment, two new aggregate indicators are proposed and formulated, one being the “total domestic environmental loading” which measures the gross environmental burden imposed on the domestic environment by human activities, and the other the “total environmental stress” which measures the intensity of environmental pressure on a nation’s environment. The indicators are applied to six nations, namely, China, Germany, Netherlands, Austria, Japan, and The United States, for a number of years. Results show that, during the years from 1990 to 2002, China’s total environmental stress ranged from 57 to 82 metric tons per global hectare, exhibiting a trend of first rise, then fall and then rise again. The tendency of rebound in China’s total environmental stress after 2000 is a warning sign of further environmental degradation and should be taken seriously. During the comparison period (1993-1996), the ranking of the six nations with respect to total environmental stress, in a descending order, is China, Germany, Japan, Netherlands, The United States, and Austria. The total environmental stress values of the 5 industrial nations either remained relatively stable or declined, indicating that the environmental stress of these nations exhibited various degrees of “decoupling ” from their economic growth. China’s total environmental stress, however, experienced a steady increase in the same period and has a tendency of increase after 2002.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)

Pages:

1561-1570

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Odum H., Environmental Accounting: EMERGY and Environmental Decisionmaking, Wiley, New York,1996.

Google Scholar

[2] Lieth H. and Whittaker R., The Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, Springer, New York, 1975.

Google Scholar

[3] Ehrenfeld J., Ferrão P. and Reis I., Tools to support Innovation of sustainable product Systems, International Series on Technology Policy and Innovation, University of Texas, USA, 2002.

Google Scholar

[4] Ritthoff M., Rohn H. and Liedtke C., Calculating MIPS., Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Germany, 2002.

Google Scholar

[5] European Communities, Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicator—A Methodological Guide, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2001.

Google Scholar

[6] Wackernagel M. and Rees W., Our Ecological footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada, 1996.

Google Scholar

[7] European Communities, Material use in the European Union 1980-2000: Indicators and Analysis, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, (2002)

Google Scholar

[8] Adriaanse A, Bringezu S, Hammond A, et al., Resource flows—The material basis of industrial economies, World Resources Institute, Washington DC, 1997.

Google Scholar

[9] Matthews E., Amann C., Bringezu S. et al., The Weight of Nations—Material Outflows from Industrial Economies, World Resources Institute, Washington DC, 2000.

Google Scholar

[10] Ambiental G., Total Material Requirement of the Basque Country, http://www.ihobe.net/publicaciones/descarga/I-materiales_capv.pdf, 2003.

Google Scholar

[11] Schandl H. and Schulz N., Using Material Flow Accounting to Operationalize the Concept of Society's Metabolism, A Preliminary MFA for the United Kingdom for the period of 1937-1997, http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/pubs/ workpaps/pdf/2000-03-1.pdf, 2000.

Google Scholar

[12] Hammer M. and Hubacek K., Material Flows and Economic Development-Material Flow Analysis of the Hungarian Economy, http://www. seri.at/ Data/seri/events/ quovadis/Hammer_Hubacek_MFA_Hungary.pdf, 2002.

Google Scholar

[13] Isacsson A. Jonsson K., Linder I. et al., DMI and DMC for Sweden 1987-1997, http://www.scb.se/statistik/MI/MI1202/2000I02/ MIFT9905.pdf, 2000.

Google Scholar

[14] Bringezu S., Schutz H., Steger S., et al., International Comparison of Resource Use and Its Relation to Economic Growth, Ecological Economics, Vol. 51, 97-124, 2004.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.010

Google Scholar

[15] Huttler W., Schandl H. and Weisz H., Are Industrial Economies on the Path of Dematerialization? Material Flow Accounts for Austria 1960-1996: Indicators and International Comparison, Third ConAccount meetings, Amsterdam, 1998.

Google Scholar

[16] Canas A., Ferrao P. and Conceicao P., A New Environmental Kuznets Curve? Relationship Between Direct Material Input and Income Per Capita: Evidence from Industrialized Countries, Ecological Economics, Vol. 46, 217-229, 2003.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(03)00123-x

Google Scholar

[17] Moll S., Reducing Societal Metabolism—A Sustainable Development Analysis, Paper Presented for the Conference "Nature, Society and history", Vienna, 1999.

Google Scholar

[18] Bartelmus P., Bringzu S. and Moll S., Dematerialization, Environmental Accounting and Resource Management, Wuppertal papers, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Germany, 2001.

Google Scholar

[19] Schutz H. and Welfens M., Sustainable Development by Dematerialization in Production and Consumption—Strategy for the New Environmental Policy in Poland. Wuppertal papers, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Germany, 2000.

Google Scholar

[20] Bartelmus Peter., Dematerialization and Capital Maintenance: Two Sides of the Sustainability Coin. Wuppertal papers, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy, Germany, 2002.

Google Scholar

[21] Fischer-Kowalski M., Material flow accounting: Information Package for the training workshop in Austria, Vienna, 1999.

Google Scholar

[22] Ding Y., Material Input of Metal Production, Master's Thesis, Northeastern University, China, 2004.

Google Scholar

[23] Liu J. Z., Material Flow Account and Resources Efficiency Revolution of China, Master's Thesis, Northeastern University, China, 2004.

Google Scholar

[24] Liu J. X., Time Series and Geographical Distribution of Ecological Footprint for China, Master's Thesis, Northeastern University, China, 2004.

Google Scholar

[25] World Wide Fund for Nature, Living planet report, http://www.footprintnetwork. org/, 2002, 2004.

Google Scholar