Ozone Prediction Performance of HMM Based on the Data Compressed by Different Wavelet Basis Functions

Abstract:

Surface ozone in the air boundary layer is one of the most harmful air pollutants produced by photochemical reaction between nitrogen oxides and volatile hydrocarbons, which causes great damage to human beings and environment. The prediction of surface ozone levels plays an important role in the control and the reduction of air pollutants. As model-driven statistical prediction models, hidden Markov Models (HMMs) are rich in mathematical structure and work well in many important applications. Due to the complex structure of HMM, long observation sequences would increase computational load by geometric ratio. In order to reduce training time, wavelet decomposition is used to compress the original observations into shorter ones. During compression step, observation sequences compressed by different wavelet basis functions keep different information content. This may have impact on prediction results. In this paper, ozone prediction performance of HMM based on different wavelet basis functions are discussed. Shannon entropy is employed to measure how much information content is kept in the new sequence compared to the original one. Data from Houston Metropolitan Area, TX are used in this paper. Results show that wavelet basis functions used in data compression step can affect the HMM model performance significantly. The new sequence with the maximum Shannon entropy generates the best prediction result.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)
• Pages: 1586-1591
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.518-523.1586
• Online since: May 2012
• Authors: Hao Zhang, Ze Meng Zhao, Ahmet Palazoglu, Wei Sun
• Keywords: Hidden Markov Model (HMM), Ozone Prediction, Shannon Entropy, Wavelet Basis Function

References

[1] Seinfeld, J.H. and S.N. Pandis, in: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: From air pollution to climate change, edited by John Wiley, NY (1998)

[2] Tilton.B.E: Envron. Sci. Tchnol. Vol. 23 (1989), p.3

[3] Koren.H, R. Devlin, et al. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. Vol. 139 (1989), p.2

[4] Fuhrer. J., L. Skrby, et al. Environmental Pollution. Vol. 97(1997), pp.91-106

[5] Information on http://www.epa.gov/ozonedesignations/2008standards/index.htm

[6] Cobourn W.G. and M.C. Hubbard. Atmospheric Environment. Vol. 33 (1999), pp.4663-4674

[7] Sousa. S., F. Martins, et al. Chemosphere. Vol. 64 (2006), pp.1141-1149

[8] Al-Alawi. S. M., S. A. Abdul-Wahab, et al. Environmental Modeling&Software. Vol. 23 (2008), pp.396-403

[9] Comrie. A.C. Journal of the Air&Waste Management Association. Vol. 47 (1997), pp.653-663

[10] Rabiner, L.R. Proceedings of the IEEE. Vol. 77 (1989)

[11] Brand. M., N. Oliver, et al. IEEE. (1997)

[12] Karplus. K., C. Barrett, et al. Bioinformatics. Vol. 14 (1998), pp.846-856

[13] Miao, Q. and V. Makis. Mechanical System and signal Processing. Vol. 21 (2007), pp.840-855

[14] Dong, M., D. Yang, et al. Expert Systems with Applications. Vol. 36 (2009), pp.9046-9055

[15] Nunez, J., X. Otazu, et al. Geoscience and Remote Sensing , IEEE Transactions. Vol. 37 (1999), pp.1204-1211

[16] Ren, W. X. and Z. S. Sun. Engineering Structures. Vol. 30 (2008), pp.2840-2849

[17] Sun, W., R. Mukherjee, et al. Microelectronic Engineering. Vol. 86 (2009), pp.340-351

[18] Baum, L.E., T. Petrie, et al. The Annuals of Mathematical Statistics. Vol. 41 (1970), pp.164-171

[19] Bialynicki-Birula, I. and J. Mycielski. Communications in Mathematical Physics. Vol. 44, pp.129-132

[20] Liu. Y. A Study of Wavelet Entropy in Multivariable Process Monitoring. (2010) In Chinese.

[21] Information on http://www.tceq.texas.gov/agency/data/ozone_data.html

[22] Information on http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~wavelab/