Detection of Methanogens in Anaerobic Granular Sludge by FISH Targeting for Functional Genes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Methanogens play an important role in the anaerobic digestion and production of methane, and show significant influence on the performance of anaerobic wastewater treatment process. Then the methanogens in anaerobic granular sludge samples from full-scale UASB bioreactors treating avermectin or starch wastewater were detected by FISH using 16S rRNA gene-based probe and functional gene-based probes. The results showed that the hybridization of methanogens in simultaneous FISH with mcrA gene-based and 16S rRNA gene-based probes was high coincident and the coincidence degree was about 60%-80%, implying the preferable hybridization consistency between functional gene-based probe and 16S rRNA gene-based probe. The relative abundance of methanogens obtained in FISH analysis using 16S rRNA gene-based probe seemed higher than that using functional gene-based probes, indicating that functional gene could provide more specific detection of methanogens than 16S rRNA gene probably. For functional gene-based probes, the methanogen-specificity was in the following order: mcrA<F420<mtr. During the development process of both granular sludge samples, the maximum relative abundance of methanogens was obtained at its mature phase using all probes. The relative abundance of methanogens in the sludge sample treating avermectin wastewater was lower than that treating starch wastewater, indicating smaller methanogenic population in the sludge sample treating avermectin wastewater due to inhibitory effect of antibiotic residue on methanogens probably.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)

Pages:

299-304

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] L.W. Hulshoff Pol, S.I. de Castro Lopes, G. Lettinga and P.N.L. Lens: Water Res. Vol. 38 (2004), pp.1376-1389

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.002

Google Scholar

[2] A.T. Akarsubasi, O. Ince, A.N. Oz, B. Kırdar and B.K. Ince: Process Biochem. Vol. 41 (2006), pp.28-35

DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2005.01.029

Google Scholar

[3] A. Vlyssides, E.M. Barampouti and S. Mai: J. Environ. Manage. Vol. 86 (2008), pp.660-664

Google Scholar

[4] J. O'Reilly, C. Lee, G. Collins, F. Chinalia, T. Mahony and V. O'Flaherty: Water Res. Vol. 43 (2009), pp.3365-3374

Google Scholar

[5] J.L. Sanz and T. Köchling: Process Biochem. Vol. 42 (2007), pp.119-133

Google Scholar

[6] J.R. Coleman, D.E. Culley, W.B. Chrisler and F.J. Brockman: J. Microbiol. Methods Vol. 71 (2007), pp.246-255

Google Scholar

[7] Xian Zhang, A. Tani, F. Kawai and K. Kimbara: J. Biosci. Bioeng. Vol. 110 (2010), pp.716-719

Google Scholar

[8] T. Tagawa, Y. Sekiguchil, A. Ohashi, H. Harada and K. Syutsubo: Water Sci. Technol. Vol. 42 (2000), pp.77-82

Google Scholar

[9] G. Crocetti, M. Murto and L. Björnsson: J. Microbiol. Methods Vol. 65 (2006), pp.194-201

Google Scholar

[10] K. Kubota, A. Ohashi, H. Imachi and H. Harada: J. Microbiol. Methods Vol. 66 (2006), pp.521-528

Google Scholar

[11] G. Rastogi, D.R. Ranade, T.Y. Yeole, M.S. Patole and Y.S. Shouche: Bioresource Technol. Vol. 99 (2008), pp.5317-5326

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.024

Google Scholar

[12] W.T. Liu, O.C. Chan and H.H.P. Fang: Water Res. Vol. 36 (2002), pp.1767-1775

Google Scholar

[13] W. Jupraputtasri, N. Boonapatcharoen and S. Cheevadhanarak: J. Microbiol. Methods Vol. 61 (2005), pp.95-104

Google Scholar

[14] M.W. Friedrich: Methyl-coenzyme M Reductase: Methods Enzymol. Vol. 397 (2005), pp.428-442

Google Scholar

[15] T. Lienard and G. Gottschalk: FEBS Letters Vol.425 (1998), pp.204-208

Google Scholar

[16] M. Song, S.G. Shin and S.H. Wang: Bioresource Technol. Vol. 101 (2010), pp.523-528

Google Scholar

[17] W. Jupraputtasri, N. Boonapatcharoen, S. Cheevadhanarak, P. Chaiprasert, M. Tanticharoen and S. Techkarnjanaruk: J. Microbiol. Methods Vol.61 (2005), pp.95-104

DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2004.11.017

Google Scholar