Different Organic Resources Influence Combined Forms of Humus in Black Soil Aggregation

Article Preview

Abstract:

The interaction of soil aggregate with humic substances (HS) is important for fertility and soil carbon sequestration, So it is one of the hot issues of international affairs and Low-carbon Society. In this paper, the pot experiment was conducted to study the effect of the different organic materials on the combined states of humus in black soil. The results showed as follow: Compared with control treatment(CK), application of organic materials significantly increased content of loosely combined in>2mm and content of stably combined, but there was markedly differences among organic materials. Woody residues made loosely and unitedly and stably combined forms of humus in 1-0.5mm aggregates higher than others, at the same time, unitedly and stably combined in 0.5-0.25mm of woody residues were the highest. Animal excrement significantly increased unitedly and stably combined in 2-1mm. And herb residues enhanced stably combined in >2mm obviously. Use of animal remnant resulted in significant increase of tightly combined, whereas markedly decreased tightly combined in 2-1mm. Optical property combined forms of humus varied among organic materials.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)

Pages:

314-318

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C.J. Bronick and R.Lal:Geoderma. vol.124(2005), p.3.

Google Scholar

[2] G. Brunetti, C. Plaza, C.E. Clapp and N. Senesi: Soil Biology&Biochemistry. vol.39(2007), p.1355.

Google Scholar

[3] P.Smith, K.W. Goulding , K.A. Smith, D.S. Powlson , J.U. Smith, P. Falloon , K. Coleman: Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. vol.60(2001), p.237.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1012617517839

Google Scholar

[4] R.Lal, M. Griffin, J.Apt, and L. Lave: Science. vol.304(2004) p.393.

Google Scholar

[5] J.Balesdent, , C. Chenu and M. Balabane: Soil and Tillage Research. vol.53(2000), p.215.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-1987(99)00107-5

Google Scholar

[6] A.F. Plante and W.B.McGill: Soil and Tillage Research .vol.66(2002), p.79.

Google Scholar

[7] S.Abiven, S.Menasseri and C. Chenu: Soil Biol.Biochem. vol.41(2009), p.1.

Google Scholar

[8] J.Six, E.T. Elliott and K. Paustian: Soil Biol. Biochem. vol.32(2000), p.2099.

Google Scholar

[9] M.H. Beare, M.L. Cabrera, P.F. Hendrix and D.C. Coleman: Soil Sci.Soc.Am.J. vol.58(1994),p.787.

Google Scholar

[10] M.R. Carter, D.A. Angers, E.G. Gregorich and M.A. Bolinder: Can.J. Soil Sci. vol.83(2003),p.11.

Google Scholar

[11] J.Six, R.T. Conant, E.A. Paul and K.Paustian: vol.241(2002),p.155.

Google Scholar

[12] C.Feller and M.H. Beare: Geoderma. vol.79(1997), p.69.

Google Scholar

[13] K.M. Hati, A.Swarup, B.Mishra, M.C. Manna, R.H. Wanjari, K.G. Mandal and A.K. Misra: Geoderma. vol.148(2008), p.173.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.09.015

Google Scholar

[14] J.Six, E.T. Elliott and K.Paustian: Soil Science Society of America Journal. vol.62(1998),p.1367.

Google Scholar

[15] Yi XIONG: Soil colloid (book 2). Science Press, Bei-jing.(1985),p.62.

Google Scholar

[16] Campitelli P.and C.Silvia: Geoderma. vol.144(2008),p.325.

Google Scholar

[17] S.Abiven, S. Menasseri, D.A. Angers and P. Leterme: Soil Sci.Soc., Am.J. vol.72(2008),p.119.

Google Scholar