Research on COD Removal and SOUR of Aerobic Granule with Intermittent Aeration in Continuous Flow System

Article Preview

Abstract:

The impact of intermittent aeration on aerobic granular sludge in a continuous flow reactor was studied. Nine intermittent aeration modes were set up to investigate the change of DO, pH, COD removal efficiency and SOUR. The results showed DO and pH had different change tendencies. The 3-1 mode was the optimal mode under these experiment conditions. In aerating stage, the highest COD removal efficiency could achieve 96.32%. Stopping aeration for one hour, COD removal efficiency could still reach at 90.20%. This operation mode could save about 25% energy consumption theoretically. The comparison of SOUR between continuous aeration and 4-2 mode showed that the intermittent aeration had little effect on granular sludge activity. The theory of stress & damage and unbalanced growth could explain this appearance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)

Pages:

478-484

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T.R. Long, J.S. Guo, X. Gao, et al.: China Environmental Science Vol.20 (2000), p.366 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] T.Y. Huang and G.M. Sun: Journal of Suzhou Institute of Urban Construction and Environmental Protection Vol.14 (2001), p.22 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Liu and J.H. Tay: Biotechnology Advances Vol.22 (2004), p.533.

Google Scholar

[4] D.P. Cassidy and E. Belia: Water Research Vol.39 (2005), p.4817.

Google Scholar

[5] N. Schwarzenbeck, J.M. Borge and P.A. Wilderer: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Vol.66 (2005), p.711.

Google Scholar

[6] J.M. Garrido: Water Research Vol.38 (2004), p.3389.

Google Scholar

[7] K.Z. Su and H.Q. Yu: Environmental Science and Technology Vol.39 (2005), p.818.

Google Scholar

[8] M.K. de Kreuk, J. J.Heijnen and M.C.M. van Loosdrecht: Biotechnology and Bioengineering Vol.90 (2005), p.761.

Google Scholar

[9] A.N. Anuar, Z. Ujang, M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, et al.: Water Science and Technology Vol.56 (2007), p.55.

Google Scholar

[10] J.H. Tay, H.L. Jiang and S.T.L. Tay: Journal of Environmental Engineering-ASCE Vol.130 (2004a), p.1415.

Google Scholar

[11] B.Y.P. Moy, J.H. Tay, S.K. Toh, et al.: Letters in Applied Microbiology Vol.34 (2002), p.407. [12] APHA: Standards Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th (American Public Health Assoc., Washington, DC, USA, 1998).

Google Scholar

[13] G.H. Chen, W.K. Yip, H.K. Mo, et al.: Water Research Vol.35 (2001), p.1029.

Google Scholar

[14] M. Majone, K. Dircks and J.J. Beun: Water Science and Technology Vol.39 (1999), p.61.

Google Scholar