Absorption Ability of Different Tree Species to S, Cl and Heavy Metals in Urban Forest Ecosystem

Article Preview

Abstract:

Heavy metals and atmosphere pollutants that caused the soil pollution and low air quality are main environmental problems in cities which located in the industrialized regions. Different tree species in urban forest ecosystem have absorption ability to heavy metals in the soil and atmosphere pollutant and ameliorate environmental pollution. However, the influence of different tree species on the absorption ability of different pollutant is not yet clear, and this held up selection suitable tree species in urban forest plantations to improve urban environment. In the study we compered pollution absorption ability of 13 tree species in Shenyang, Northeast China. The results showed that, the adsorption capacity of different tree species on pollutants are different. The highest value of Cu was 9.32 mg kg-1 found in Berberisthumbergii cv. Atropurpurea, Zn was 51.461 mg kg-1 in Pinus bungeana, Pb was 7.459 mg kg-1 in Malus pumila Mill, Cr was 9.841 mg kg-1 in Buxus microphylla, S was 8916.07 mg kg-1 in Salix babylonica, Zn was 4678.388 mg kg-1 in Buxus microphylla. Pollutant concentrations in the same plant species are different in 3 different sample sites. This indicate the contaminated degree of 3 sample sites were different. In our study, Huigong square pollution degree is serious than the Beiling Park and Huishan ecological park. Significant correlation was found between Cu and Cr, Cu and Cl, S and Zn, Cr and Cl (P<0.01) and that between Cu and Zn, Cu and Pb at 0.05 level. The relationship between heavy metals and atmosphere pollutant (S and Cl) indicated that traffic activities could be one of the dominant roles of heavy metal and atmosphere pollution in Shenyang City.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)

Pages:

48-53

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. Sawidis, J. Breuste, M. Mitrovic, P. Pavlovic and K. Tsigaridas: Environmental Pollution Vol. 159 (2011), pp.3560-3570.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.08.008

Google Scholar

[2] H. Abdollahi, M. Fekri and M. Mahmodabadi: International Journal of Agriculture & Biology Vol. 13 (2011), pp.599-602.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Chatterjee, C. Chatterjee: Environmental Pollution Vol. 109(2000), pp.69-74.

Google Scholar

[4] H. T. Wolterbeek, P. Kuik, T.G. Verburg and G.W. Wamelink: Environmental Monitoring Assessment Vol. 40 (1996), pp.185-201

Google Scholar

[5] L.O. Onasanya, K. Ajewole and A. Adeyeye: Environmental International Vol. 19 (1993), pp.615-618.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Celik, A. Kartal, A. Akdogan and Y. Kaska: Environmental International Vol. 31 (2005), pp.105-112.

Google Scholar

[7] V. Andreu and E. Gimeno: Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal Vol. 27 (1996), pp.33-48.

Google Scholar

[8] F. Pinamonti, G. Stringari, F. Gasperi and G. Zorzi: Resour Conserv Recycl Vol. 21 (1997), pp.29-43.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Dion, S. Loranger, G. Kennedy, F. Gourchesne and J. Zayed: Air and Soil Pollution Vol. 71 (1993), pp.29-41.

Google Scholar

[10] C.S.C. Wong, L. Xiangdong and I. Thornton: Environmental Pollution Vol. 142 (2006), pp.1-16.

Google Scholar

[11] P.J. Jackson, P.J. Unkefer, E. Delhaize and N.J. Robinson, in: Environmental Injury to Plants, edtied by F. Katterman Academic Press, New York (1990), pp.233-250.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Peris, C. Micó, L. Recatalá, R. Sánchez and Sánchez: Science of the Total Environment Vol. 378 (2007), pp.42-48

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.030

Google Scholar

[13] A.M. Faggi, F. Fujiwara, C. Anido and P.E. Perelman: Environ Monit Assess Vol. 178 (2011), pp.237-245

Google Scholar

[14] A.L. Al-Khlaifat, O.A. Al-Khashman: Atmospheric Environment Vol. 41 (2007), pp.8891-8897

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.08.028

Google Scholar

[15] W.G. Keltjens and E.van Loenen: Plant and Soil Vol. 119 (1989), pp.39-50.

Google Scholar

[16] H. Dahmani-Muller, F. van Oort, B. Gélie and M. Balabane: Environmental Pollution Vol. 109 (2000), pp.231-238.

DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(99)00262-6

Google Scholar

[17] S.H. Wei, Q.X. Zhou and U.K. Saha: Water Air Soil Pollut Vol. 192 (2008), pp.173-181

Google Scholar

[18] Y.B. Sun, Q.X. Zhou, X.K. Xie and R. Liu: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 174 (2010), pp.455-462.

Google Scholar

[19] D. Wang, H.M. Ren, J.S. Liu, J.B. Yu and X.L. Zhang: Chin. Geogr. Sci Vol. 16 (2006), pp.127-132.

Google Scholar

[20] L. van Nevel, J. Mertens, J. Staelens, A.D. Schrijver, F.M.G. Tack, S.D. Neve, E. Meers and K. Verheyen: Ecological Engineering Vol. 37 (2011), pp.1072-1080

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.07.010

Google Scholar

[21] V. Angelova, R. Ivanova, V. Delibaltova and K. Ivanov: Ind Crops Prod Vol. 19 (2004), pp.197-205.

Google Scholar

[22] O.A. Al-Khashman: Environ. Vol. 38 (2004), pp.6803-6812.

Google Scholar

[23] O.A. Al-Khashman and R. Shawabkeh: Environ. Pollut Vol. 140 (2006), pp.387-394.

Google Scholar

[24] M.Hollwarth: Stab-Reinhalt luft Vol. 42 (1982), pp.373-378.

Google Scholar

[25] S.G. Liu and S.Q. Bai: J. Appl. Geophys Vol. 60 (2006), pp.1-12.

Google Scholar

[26] D.K. Essumang, D.K. Dodoo, S. Obiri and A.K. Oduro: Environ. Monit. Assess Vol. 121 (2006), pp.401-408.

DOI: 10.1007/s10661-005-9137-x

Google Scholar

[27] F.Y. Li, Z.P. Fan, P.F. Xiao, K. Oh, X.P. Ma and W. Hou: Environ. Geol Vol. 54 (2009), pp.1815-1823.

Google Scholar

[28] M. Romic and D. Romic: Environ. Geol Vol. 43 (2003), pp.795-805.

Google Scholar