Effects of Compressing Pressure, Screen Size and Moisture Content on Pellets Density of Water Hyacinth

Article Preview

Abstract:

Water hyacinth (WH) has been one the most troublesome caused by invasive species in the warm regions over the world. However, it has the potential to be compressed into biomass pellets as a local source of substitute and renewable solid fuel in the future. The method and preparation of comperssing WH pellets were investigated in this study using a compressing apparatus in the lab. WH samples were ground by a hammer mill with three different screen sizes (2.0, 3.0and 4.0mm), compressed with five levels of compressing forces (1000, 2000, 3000, 4000 and 5000N) at three levels of moisture content (10%, 15% and 20% wb). The density of each sample pellets was calculated and recorded. The effects of compressing pressure, screen size and moisture content on pellets density were analyzed depending on the statistical analysis of variance (ANOVA). It was found in this study that all the three factors except screen size affected WH pellets density significantly, high quality of WH pellets in terms of high pellets density can be obtained under a compressing pressure about 80MPa and at a moisture contnet about 15% (wb).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 518-523)

Pages:

63-67

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Pieterse A.H; Murphy, K., eds: Origin, autecology, and spread of troublesome aquatic weeds, Oxford, England, Oxford University Press, pp.31-38. (1990)

Google Scholar

[2] Singhal V, Rai JPN. Bioresource Technology. Vol. 86(2003), pp.221-225

Google Scholar

[3] Das A., Kalamdhad A.S. International Journal of Research in Chemistry and Environment, Vol. July (2011), pp.109-113

Google Scholar

[4] Lu, JB, Wu, JG, Fu, ZH and Zhu, L. Environmental Management, Vol. 40 (2007), pp.823-830

Google Scholar

[5] Wong J.W.C. and Fang M. Water Research, Vol. 34 (2000), pp.3694-3698

Google Scholar

[6] Abraham, M, Kurup, GM. Ferment Bioenergy, Vol. 82(1996), pp.259-63

Google Scholar

[7] Anjanabha B., Pawan K. Electronic Journal Environment, Agriculture and Food Chemistry, Vol. 9 (2010), pp.112-122

Google Scholar

[8] Gunnarsson CC, Petersen, CM. Waste Management, Vol.27 (2007), pp.117-29

Google Scholar

[9] Mani, S., L.G. Tabil and S. Sokhansanj. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol.97(2006), pp.1420-1426

Google Scholar

[10] Adapa, P.K, A. Singh, G.J. Schoenau and L.G. International Journal of Powder Handling and Processing, Vol.18(5) (2006.), pp.294-299

Google Scholar

[11] Adapa, P.K., L.G. Tabil, G.J. Schoenau, B. Crerar and S. Sokhansanj. Handling and Processing, Vol.14(4) (2002), pp.252-259

Google Scholar

[12] Li, Y., and H. Liu. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol.19 (2000), pp.177-186

Google Scholar

[13] Mani, S., L.G. Tabil, and S. Sokhansanj. Powder Handling & Process, Vol.15(3) (2003), pp.160-168

Google Scholar

[14] Kaliyan, N. and R.V. Morey. Biomass and bioenergy, Vol.33 (2009), pp.337-359

Google Scholar