The Numerical Simulation of Buried Hill Fractured Reservoir by CO2 WAG with Overlap Alternative Horizontal Well Pattern

Article Preview

Abstract:

For the trends of global climate warming, it is great important to implement the Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. This paper describes the numerical simulation of CO2 displacement enhanced oil recovery (EOR) in M reservoir. The M reservoir is an extra-thick buried hill fractured reservoir, which use overlap alternative horizontal well pattern to produce. Considering the time-varying effects of fracture’s porosity and permeability parameters, combining the develop dynamic and the diversification of physical property parameters of fractured formation, use the dual porosity dual permeability model and the three-dimensional components simulator to simulate the develop process. By CO2 WAG orthogonal experiment design, can simulate and predict the development effect of fractured buried hill reservoir affected by factors such as: different production and injection well pattern, injection intensity, gas water slug ratio, alternating cycle and so on. The results show that in the process of CO2 WAG can significantly reduce the risk of gas breakthrough by overlap alternative horizontal well pattern, and reduce the negative impact by fracture properties, also can improve EOR and CO2 sequestration effectively. On this basis, this paper evaluates the suitability of WAG development methods to fractured buried hill reservoir with overlap alternative horizontal well pattern, also optimizes the reasonable development plan for M reservoir.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 524-527)

Pages:

1634-1638

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] IEA Report. CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option [R].2008.

Google Scholar

[2] Ren Xiangkun, Cui Yongjun, Bu Xuepeng, et al. Analysis on CO2 Storage Potentiality in Ordos Basin. Energy of China. 2010, 32 (1):29-32 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] Xiaochun Li, Zhiming Fan, Ning Wei, et al. Discussion on technical roadmap of CO2 capture and storage in China. Rock and Soil Mechanics. 2009, 30 (9): 2674-2678 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[4] Xiaochun Li, Yanfeng Liu, Bing Bai, et al. Ranking and screening of CO2 saline aquifer storage zones in China. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(5): 963-968 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[5] H.G. Yu, G.Z. Zhou, W.T. Fan, et al. Predicted CO2 enhanced coalbed methane recovery and CO2 sequestration in China. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2007, 71(2-3):345-357.

DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2006.10.002

Google Scholar

[6] Yanfeng Liu, Xiaochun Li, Bing Bai. Preliminary estimation of CO2 storage capacity of coalbeds in China. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(16): 2947-2952 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[7] Yan-feng Liu, Xiaochun Li, Zhiming Fang, et al. Preliminary estimation of CO2 storage capacity in gas fields in China. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(12): 2277-2281 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[8] Shilun Li, Zhengqing Zhang, Xinquan Ran, et al. The technology of EOR by gas injection. Sichuan Science and Technology Press. 2001, 6: 16-230 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[9] Yousef Ghomian, Gary A. Pope, Kamy Sepehrnoori. Hysteresis and Field-Scale Optimization of WAG Injection for Coupled CO2-EOR and Sequestration. SPE 110639-MS

DOI: 10.2118/110639-ms

Google Scholar

[10] Wei Yan and Erling H. Stenby. The Influence of CO2 Solubility in Brine on Simulation of CO2 Injection into Water Flooded Reservoir and CO2 WAG. SPE 131094-MS

DOI: 10.2118/131094-ms

Google Scholar

[11] A.A. Aleidan, D.D. Mamora, D.S. Schechter. Experimental and Numerical Simulation Studies of Different Modes of CO2 Injection in Fractured Carbonate Cores. SPE 143512-MS

DOI: 10.2118/143512-ms

Google Scholar

[12] J.Vuillaume, I. Akervoll, P.Bergmo. CO2 Injection Efficiency - Synthesis of Conceptual Chalk Model: Incremental Recovery and CO2 Storage Potential. SPE 143531-MS

DOI: 10.2118/143531-ms

Google Scholar

[13] Istvan U.M.P, Tibor F.M.P. CO2 gas+WAG+water injection in the same oil reservoir.SPE 143833

Google Scholar

[14] Ping Guo, Zhiwang Yuan; Guangzhi Liao. Status and enlightenment of international gas injection EOR technology. Natural Gas Industry. 2008, 29(8):92-96(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[15] Wei Wu. Numerical simulation of the buried hill reservoir in the Sudeerte oilfield. Special oil Gas Reservior. 2011,18(2): 82-84 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[16] van Lingen, P.P., Barzanji, O.H.M., van Kruijsdijk, C.P.J.W. WAG Injection to Reduce Capillary Entrapment in Small-Scale Heterogeneities. SPE 36662-MS

DOI: 10.2118/36662-ms

Google Scholar

[17] Wegener D.C., Harpole, K.J. Determination of Relative Permeability and Trapped Gas Saturation for Predictions of WAG Performance in the South Cowden CO2 Flood. SPE 35429-MS

DOI: 10.2118/35429-ms

Google Scholar

[18] M. Dong, J. Foraie, S. Huang, I. Chatzis. Analysis of Immiscible Water-Alternating-Gas (WAG) Injection Using Micromodel Tests. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology. 2005, 44(2)

DOI: 10.2118/05-02-01

Google Scholar

[19] Alireza Mollaei, Mojdeh Delshad. A Novel Forecasting Tool for WAG Floods. SPE 148742-MS

Google Scholar

[20] Zhou Wanshan. Numerical simulation study and practice on buried-hill reservoir development with overlapped horizontal well. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field. 2010 ,17(5): 602-604 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar