A Density-Method-Based Model for Allocating the Refining Cost of Gasoline and Diesel in China

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, we present a density-method-based model to allocate the refining cost to petroleum products such as gasoline and diesel. By using this model, we also present an empirical study of China, which is based on a virtual crude oil refining process proposed referring to the technical configuration of oil refining industry in China. Three scenarios of the cost of gasoline and diesel are illustrated referring to different settings of the change of the international crude oil prices. The results indicate that the cost of gasoline and diesel change nearly the same amplitude as the change of crude oil price. However, the margin between the cost of gasoline and diesel will slightly increase with the rise of crude oil price. Besides, we also present a sensitivity analysis of the operation cost of each unit in the refining process. The results reveal that the operation cost of catalytic reforming is the most important influencing factor of the cost of gasoline, while the operation cost of hydrogen cracking influences the cost of diesel mostly.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 524-527)

Pages:

1773-1779

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) of China. China energy statistical yearbook 2011. China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2012.

Google Scholar

[2] X.K. Qian, X.F. Jiang et al., Domestic and foreign oil and gas development report, The Economics and Technology Research Institute of China National Petroleum Corporation, 2011. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] L.W. Ma, F. Fu, et al., Energy Policy. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.023

Google Scholar

[4] Information on: http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/zcfb/zcfbtz/2009tz/W020090508568402700156.pdf (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] W.D. Walls, Energy Policy. 38 (2010) 2110–2115

Google Scholar

[6] A.S. Manne, Scheduling of Petroleum Refinery Operations, Cambridge, (1963)

Google Scholar

[7] O. Ocic, Oil refineries in the 21st century: Energy efficient, cost effective, environmentally benign. German: Wiley-VCH; 2005.

DOI: 10.1002/3527604146

Google Scholar

[8] C.K. L Guy, Energy Policy. 38(2) (2010) 932-944.

Google Scholar

[9] DESNBS-Department of Energy Statistics of National Bureau of Statistics of China, China energy statistical yearbook 2009, China Statistics Press, Beijing, 2010.(In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[10] Q.Y, Wang, Reference source of China Sustainable Energy Program: 2010 energy statistics 2010. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[11] Energy Information Administration, China Energy Data, Statistics and Analysis - Oil, Gas, Electricity, Coal. Washington, DC, 2010.

Google Scholar

[12] Eni Spa, World Oil and Gas Review 2011, ten ed., Gruppo Poligrafico Tiberino S.r.l., Rome, 2011.

Google Scholar

[13] S Chen, Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals, 38(5) (2007), 34-38. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[14] D.M Li, Petroleum Refinery Engineering, 29(8) (1999), 73-76. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[15] Z.X, Kuang, and J.M, Sun, Contemporary Chemical Industry, 31(1) (2002), 1-7. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[16] K. Wu, Oil & Gas Journal; Mar 7, (2011)

Google Scholar

[17] China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), CNPC compiled data, 2007. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[18] Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West RE, Plant design and economics for chemical engineers. Columbus (OH): McGraw-Hill; 2003.

Google Scholar

[19] D. Lozowshi, Chemical engineering plant cost index (CEPCI). Chemical Engineering, 116(13)( 2009), 63-64.

Google Scholar

[20] Energy information administration, International energy outlook 2011. Washington, DC, 2011.

Google Scholar