A Parking Demand Forecasting Method for Urban Comprehensive Passenger Transport Hub Oriented High-Speed Rail

Article Preview

Abstract:

Although traffic development brings convenience to citizen, problems such as parking, traffic transferring, caused by passenger transport hub have aroused extensive attention from society. Based on teasing parking demand hierarchy and willingness choice, concept of expected utility is introduced to uncover logical relationship among transport hub, influence factors, and parking demand. Data about parking facilities and their characteristics, parker desire, characterization parameters related with hub, are surveyed and collected to analyze and confirm the key influence factors on the basis of urban comprehensive passenger transport hub oriented high-speed rail, for setting up the relation model between parking demand at synthesis passenger hub and its impact factors, which is used to propose the forecasting method of parking demand at the comprehensive passenger transport hub oriented high-speed rail.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 524-527)

Pages:

828-831

Citation:

Online since:

May 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Oskar Froidh. Market effeets of regional high-speed trains on the Svealand line. Journal Of Transport Geography, 2005, 13(4): 352-361.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.12.006

Google Scholar

[2] Dahai He, Yuntao Chang. Planning study of the integrated transport hub at Changchun station. Transport World, 2011, 16: 134-137. (In Chinese)

Google Scholar

[3] Bonsall, P.. Traveller behaviour: decision-making in an unpredictable world. Journal of Intelligent Transport Systems. 2004, 8(1): 45-60.

DOI: 10.1080/15472450490437744

Google Scholar

[4] Junyi Zhang, Harry Timmermans, Aloys Borgers, Donggen Wang G. Modeling traveler choice behavior using the concepts of relative utility and relative interest. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2004, 38(3): 215-234.

DOI: 10.1016/s0191-2615(03)00009-2

Google Scholar