Determination of Geometric Shape of the Molecular Surface

Article Preview

Abstract:

A new type of compound can be got by docking the active site of acceptor and the active site of ligand. In general, active sites of the molecule are often located in the concave-convex regions. In this paper, we propose a new method which combines discrete Gaussian curvature with normal to determine geometric shape of the molecular surface of protein. Firstly, we compute the normal and Gaussian curvature of all vertices of the triangular mesh model that present a molecular surface. Then we choose a certain number of vertices ac-cording to Gaussian curvature of each vertex on the mesh. By doing so, the shape of the region consisting of those vertices is determined, that is the region is concave or convex.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

181-185

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Bock ME, Garutti C, Guerra C. Effective labeling of molecular surface points for cavity detection and location of putative binding sites. Computational systems bioinformatics, 2007, 263-274.

DOI: 10.1142/9781860948732_0028

Google Scholar

[2] Natarajan V, Wang Y, Bremer PT, et al. Segmenting molecular surfaces. Computer Aided Geometric Design, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cagd.2006.02.003

Google Scholar

[3] Edelsbrunner H, Facello M, Liang. On the definition and the construction of pockets in macromolecules. Pac Symp Biocomput, 1996, 272-287.

Google Scholar

[4] H Bierman, A Levin, Dzorin. Piecewise smooth subdivision surfaces with normal control. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH, (2000).

Google Scholar

[5] D L Page, A Koschan, Y Sun et al. Robust crease detection and curvature estimation of piecewise smooth surfaces form triangle mesh approximations using normal voting. Procedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001, San Francisco.

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2001.990471

Google Scholar

[6] Schneider R, Kobbelt L. Geometric fairing of irregular meshes for free-form surface design. Computer-Aided Geometric Design, 2001, 18(4): 359~379.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8396(01)00036-x

Google Scholar

[7] Moreton H P, Sequin C H. Functional optimization for fair surface design. In: Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM SIGGRAPH, Chicago, Illinois , 1992. 167~176.

DOI: 10.1145/142920.134035

Google Scholar

[8] Taubin G, Kobbelt L. Geometric Signal Processing on Large Polygonal Meshes. In: Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM SIGGRAPH, Los Angeles, California, 2001. Course 17.

Google Scholar

[9] Desbrun M, Meyer M, Schroder P, Barr A H. Implicit fairing of irregular meshes using diffusion and curvature flow. In: Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, ACM SIGGRAPH, Los Angeles, California , 1999, 317~324.

DOI: 10.1145/311535.311576

Google Scholar

[10] Meyer et al., 2002 M. Meyer, M. Desbrun, P. Schröder and A. Barr, Discrete differential-geometry operator for triangulated 2-manifolds Proc. VisMath'02, Berlin, Germany (2002).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-05105-4_2

Google Scholar

[11] Dyn N, Hormann K, Kim S-J, Levin D. Optimizing 3D triangulations using discrete curvature analysis. Press Innovations In Applied Mathematics Series archive Mathematical Methods for Curves and Surfaces, Oslo, 2000. 135~146.

Google Scholar

[12] Tsang-Chih Huang. Protein Docking Based on Geometry Shape Analysis. Department of Computer and Information Science National Chiao Tung University. 2005 Figure 5 (a)= 0. 6, = 0. 6, the result is very ideal now, in addition to a few regions aren't found. (b) = 0. 6, = 0. 7, the concave regions become smaller. (c) = 0. 7, = 0. 8, only a few concave regions are still meet currently.

Google Scholar